It has always been a conspiracy and theory that there is graphene oxide in the covid vaccines, but official evidence has now been found in nothing els then classified documents from Pfizer.

Graphene oxide is a substance that destroys cell walls. Pfizer has always denied that there is graphene oxide in the vaccine and can now expect huge damage claims.

https://icandecide.org/pfizer-documents/

125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf
Is the document you want to look at.

And you wil see this:

 The document clearly states that it was the material that covers the slide used in the cryoscopy process for examining it under electron microscopy.  That section is describing the slides and the electron microscope used in the experiment.

 Claiming graphene oxide is "in" the vaccine because its on an analytic screen used to examine it is like saying the vaccine has glass "in" it because the vials the fluid was in, for microscopic analyzation, are made of glass.  The slide material isn't a vaccine ingredient, its a component on the amorphous slides.  


For TwinStrep-tagged P2 S, 4 μL purified protein at 0.5 mg/mL were applied to gold Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 300 mesh grids freshly overlaid with graphene oxide. The sample was blotted using a Vitrobot Mark IV for 4 seconds with a force of -2 before being plunged into liquid ethane cooled by liquid nitrogen.


 Graphene oxide is nothing more than a coating applied to part of the equipment used to examine vaccine material according to the "proof" provided in this thread.  You can buy your own Quantifoil grids here:
https://www.quantifoil.com/products/quantifoil/quantifoil-circular-holes

 If Pfizer is sneaking it in, this document does not prove it.

 You want to see spin, keep believing the description of one thing, is the description of a different thing.


3.4. Cryo-EM of P2 S
For TwinStrep-tagged P2 S, 4 μL purified protein at 0.5 mg/mL were applied to gold Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 300 mesh grids freshly overlaid with graphene oxide. The sample was blotted using a Vitrobot Mark IV for 4 seconds with a force of -2 before being plunged into liquid ethane cooled by liquid nitrogen. 27,701 micrographs were collected from two identically prepared grids. Data were collected from each grid over a defocus range of -1.2 to -3.4 μm with a total electron dose of 50.32 and 50.12 e-/Å2, respectively, fractionated into 40 frames over a 6-second exposure for 1.26 and 1.25 e-/Å2/frame. On-the-fly motion correction, CTF estimation, and particle picking and extraction with a box size of 450 pixels were performed in Warp (Tegunov & Cramer, 2019), during which super-resolution data were binned to give a pixel size of 0.87 Å. A total of 1,119,906 particles were extracted. All subsequent processing was performed in RELION 3.1-beta (Zivanov et al, 2018). Particle heterogeneity was filtered out with 2D and 3D classification, yielding a set of 73,393 particles, which refined to 3.6 Å with C3 symmetry. 3D classification of this dataset without particle alignment separated out one class with a single RBD up, representing 15,098 particles. The remaining 58,295 particles, in the three RBD ‘down’ conformation, were  refined to give a final model at 3.29 Å. The atomic model from PDB ID 6XR8 (Cai et al, 2020) was rigid-body fitted into the map density, then flexibly fitted to the density using real-space refinement in Phenix (Adams et al, 2010) alternating with manual building in Coot (Emsley et al, 2010). Data collection, 3D reconstruction and model refinement statistics are listed in Table 1.

Eegore wrote on 03/22/23 at 11:10:41:



Is that like a UL, DFI, FDS, Socialist saying;
‘Ban that type of gun, because someone used that type of gun in a crime’

Is that like Baldwin saying he did not pull the trigger ?

Its that like Clinton saying ‘I did not have sex…’

So if someone is familiar with,  understands,  uses,  a particular vocabulary, which is particular,  to a particular item,  subject,  way of doing things.
And someone who understands that, because they use it. The, 'explanation’, is gospel.

Yet when someone has, the SAME, knowledge, about firearms, 2nd Amendment, etc.
That persons knowledge about the subject, the language, the meanings,
            are all ‘bunk’ !

      OK. Got it !

Serowbot wrote on 03/22/23 at 14:17:33:

 Brown,
  Warm,
   Comforting.

Yea, one could !

I only showed you a part of 1 document, and there are 626 documents.


   Then reference the one(s) that are "proof" instead of referencing the one that is not "proof" and literally telling us that's the document we want to look at and showing an image of the exact words you are referencing:

"125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf
Is the document you want to look at."


 Or is this an issue of saying there is "proof" somewhere in the 626 documents you wont look at for yourself, and the evidence is this one document that uses the words "graphene oxide" but not when describing the vaccine?

 Why show an image circling the words if they aren't the words that prove your position?

Okay, goodie!
Safe and Effective then

No, it's case closed. Again, documents are irrelevant. The jabs are deadly. Whogivesafukk WHY? Stop making it. Stop poking it in people.
Then figure it out. For now, stop hurting people.

Different lots are more deadly.
Funny how many young healthy people have fallen dead.
The government people just say they have it
Again.
If it KillYaDed every time, even democrats would figure it out