It's a red herring, because if it's there or NOT, The Jabs were known to be bad,possibly worse than doing nothing


 But by how much?  How can you even consider that an assessment if you completely ignore that humans took the vaccine, multiple times, and had zero negative impacts?  To be fair you haven't ignored it, you just completely refuse to quantify it or discuss that part in any way.  Only look at the deaths, only look at the oil spills, only the damage matters.  Unless it's about environmental warming, then it's unacceptable to only look at damages.

 As for manipulating numbers maybe actually look at some of the sources you offered instead of citing them as "proof" then telling us (Us meaning all known humans) that none of those documents, that you provided, matter.  Why offer them?

 Why can't both sides lie?  Why can't humans that took the vaccine and did not die be counted?

 

 

Eegore wrote on 04/04/23 at 14:21:07:


 Great !!!!!

Eegore wrote on 04/05/23 at 05:11:19:


So when the Gun Banners LIE about 'Gun Violence / Gun Murders'.
So when the Gun Banners LIE and use INFLATED Numbers.
So when the Gun Banners LIE about Justifiable, Defense, Accidental.
So when the Gun Banners LIE about 'the 2nd needs to be re-written'.

JUST to, SCARE, by LYING about the numbers.

You are not, OK, with that.

 Great !

Utilize the information however you want.

 I typically start by actually looking at it.

"It has been proven that the vaccine can reach the DNA and damage the self-repairing capacity of the DNA. It was presented to us that this was not possible."


 Proven in the same capacity as the "proof" in this thread?  Where a website lies to you about what the document actually says so people that won't read it for themselves spread the lie?

 Your math is not equal to the math JoG uses as your assessment includes "risk" or "roulett" which in itself requires TWO numbers to calculate the "risk" or chances of damage in "roulette".  JoG uses only ONE number, and refuses to acknowledge the people in "roulette" that live.  By his logic every person who plays Russian Roulette dies because we are not allowed to count the empty chambers that did not kill anyone.


 It has been proven that automobile accidents can kill people.

 Any time you choose to be anywhere an automobile moves you take a "risk" or play "Russian Roulette" with your life therefore 100% of automobiles are harmful to public health.  

 If we only count automobile fatalities, and completely ignore all humans that use automobiles and do not die, then 100% of automobile usage is deadly.  Not "risk" of maybe dying, but 100% D.E.A.D. every single time.



 

"You Bebunkt it whit a lot of fair Egore.
Do you want me to run AI on those ducument?"

 Go ahead.  Or you can defend lies told to you and deflect by claiming the "proof" must be in the documents you did not provide, none of which you actually looked at for yourself.

 Just make sure you do not acknowledge your source lied to you.  Anti-vaccine sources won't lie to you right?

“… If we only count automobile fatalities, and
completely ignore all humans that use automobiles and do not die,
then 100% of automobile usage is deadly…”   


WOW sounds JUST LIKE,
The argument the Gun Banning, Gun Hating, Socialist's, ‘have to change the 2nd’, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, DFI’s, use !

Using a  (60+/-%) Inflated number
    of murder from firearms,
IGNORING all other FACTS,
        To ‘prove’,
A Firearm that looks like ‘something’,
A Firearm that is a certain model,
A Firearm that holds X amount of rounds,
A Firearm that has a certain configuration,
Etc., etc., etc., Needs to be BANNED !

While NOT taking into consideration on how many rounds are fired in a year.
How many people own, firearms,
How many firearms exist.

And adding  suicide’s (calling them murders)
When if there was no firearms, there would be just as many suicides, by car/truck, hanging, jumping, drugs, suffocation, drowning, etc, etc, etc.
(Suicide can not be prevented by one ‘thing’ because another, ‘thing’ will be used.)

But hey. That’s OK !

As long as the Fairy Dust Sprinkling, click heals together, Dumb F ucking Idiot, Socialists say so.
And the people  that ‘blog’, writes on forums, ‘anchors’ on a, ‘news’ station, has a ‘comedy’ show,  call themselves a artist, or a 'actor', etc, etc, etc.
AND have NO experience with firearms, and refuses to learn.

"WOW sounds JUST LIKE,
The argument the Gun Banning, Gun Hating, Socialist's, ‘have to change the 2nd’, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, DFI’s, use !"

 WOW, JUST LIKE the argument that people who died in car accidents with Covid were documented as dying FROM Covid because the CDC "said" to do it  - that there is still no documentation for!

 OK, Got it!