Eegore wrote on 03/22/23 at 11:10:41: " The document clearly states that it was the material that covers the slide used in the cryoscopy process for examining it under electron microscopy. ... That section is describing the slides and the electron microscope used in the experiment.
Claiming graphene oxide is "in" the vaccine because its on an analytic screen used to examine it is like saying the vaccine has glass "in" it because the vials the fluid was in, for microscopic analyzation, are made of glass. The slide material isn't a vaccine ingredient, its a component on the amorphous slides. ..."
Is that like a UL, DFI, FDS, Socialist saying;
‘Ban that type of gun, because someone used that type of gun in a crime’Is that like Baldwin saying he did not pull the trigger ?
Its that like Clinton saying
‘I did not have sex…’So if someone is familiar with, understands, uses, a particular vocabulary, which is particular, to a particular item, subject, way of doing things.
And someone who understands that, because they use it. The, 'explanation’, is gospel.
Yet when someone has, the SAME, knowledge, about firearms, 2nd Amendment, etc.
That persons knowledge about the subject, the language, the meanings,
are all ‘bunk’ !
OK. Got it !