"When JOG posts something, that no one has a counter to.
It is an affirmation that he is RIGHT.
It is proof that the UL, DFI, FDS, Socialists,
 Agree
That the posting is RIGHT.


 So he cares, or he wouldn't comment about it.

 What you guys keep ignoring is that the "views" are not unique.  Maybe being RIGHT is so important this is intentionally ignored.  "Views" are NOT unique, they can be from the same person, why is this such an issue with some of you?  It's just a simple, provable, fact.

 Saying 6 people read your post because there are 6 "views" is wrong.  This should not be an ongoing b!tch session, it's just a fact.



"Remember, a 'count' is only if someone is signed in.
If they are not, the count could be a thousand views,
with no counts showing.

      “Crickets”.  LOL"

 Remember a "count" is NOT unique.  Claims that 6 "views" are from 6 different members is wrong.  This is what I am addressing.  Instead of calling people Gutless, or saying look how RIGHT I am because the "views" prove it, maybe accept that multiple "views" does NOT mean multiple members.

 I am responsible for many, many duplicate "views" and informing people of this seems to make some people angry.

 One can still be RIGHT, and still accept that multiple "views" does not mean multiple people read the post.

A-Yep, do understand, you and your software, can rack up 100's of views in less than a min.

Yet, a person, who is viewing, which is not signed in, can VIEW, without creating a 'count'.

 Agreed, this is why I said a "view" counter can never be fully accurate.

 None of that changes the fact that some members look at the "views", incorrectly assess that the "views" were different people, and that justifies insulting members for being too "chicken schitt to reply".

 When in reality - only one person read the post.

 Why informing people of this is upsetting I do not know.