Crickets.  What does he know anyway?  Don't you know that late night hosts, Howard Stern, Target clerks, and various governors know much, much more?  <Sarcasm intended>

Eegore wrote on 03/10/23 at 07:31:53:



Why so combative?  Why do you stress if you Think someone else is? That's a recurring issue with you. Why is it Your job to tell someone else when they can point out a hot topic is without comment?

I was thinking at a higher level than just this forum.  I wonder how much coverage and attention this will get.  I have no expectation of responses.  People will respond to what interests them.



Eegore wrote on 03/10/23 at 07:31:53:

Eegore wrote on 03/10/23 at 12:19:01:



I Love it! You couldn't be more wrong. You were chewing on him,,now act like it was me,, Who GIVES A SCHITT about a counter?  Why do you care that he said Crickets? Why do YOU need to fix it?

I Love it! You couldn't be more wrong. You were chewing on him,,now act like it was me,

I never said you were chewing on anyone.  You are upset over events that never happened, then more upset at me for trying to inform you.


, Who GIVES A SCHITT about a counter?

 

 You.  When you address people on here for reading your post and not answering it that indicates You care, or you wouldn't bring it up.  I keep trying to show you that the views you see are not multiple people, often times its robots, or me.  If you don't care why do you bring it up?

 When you call people "gutless" for not replying to your questions, I interpret that as caring that people reply to you.  The only issue is you defend your statements by claiming, inaccurately, that multiple forum members read your post.  This is not true.


"Why do you care that he said Crickets?"

 I already answered that.  If members state they would like to see replies within let's say a 10 hour period, I can set my software to a 10 hour interval.  I will also, as courtesy, indicate every time I re-read a post so they have a more accurate assessment of how many people read their post and did not reply.  It wont ever be fully accurate because of other software out there.

 Here's a question:  Why do you care that I asked?


"Why do YOU need to fix it?"

 There's nothing to fix.  When you claim, inaccurately, that 6 people read your post, and I know I read it 3 times and my software ran it 3 times, I will tell you, again, that the views are not unique.  6 different members did not read your post.  Only I did.

 If this angers you it is unfortunate, but I see no reason to avoid letting members know that view counts on this forum are NOT unique, many views are bots, or me.

 

"Duude,, just stop. You barked at a guy, Not Me, for typing
Crikkits,,"

 I asked a question, he answered, we had an adult exchange of information.  The only person upset here is you.  


"Nobody Needs you telling them that they should not have expected a response yet."

 I never said that, you are making that up.

 I am saying when you complain that 6 different people read your post, it often times is me.  All 6 views are mine.  If it angers you that I want to inform people that this happens, that is unfortunate for you.

 I am just letting you know, again, you get angry about an event that never happened.


"Nobody Needs you to coordinate this place."

 I am not coordinating anything here.  I am informing you that your belief that every view is a different person is wrong.  Views are not unique.


"We don't need you setting a timer."

 I am asking so people can have a more accurate assessment of unique views, if me setting a timer on my software angers you, that is unfortunate.

 If people are going to be insulted for not replying to posts, wouldn't it be better to know if one member was responsible for 12 of those "views"?  What value is it to be angry over an event that never happened?

Eegore wrote on 03/10/23 at 20:48:56:



Incorrect.

When JOG posts something, that no one has a counter to.
It is an affirmation that he is RIGHT.
It is proof that the UL, DFI, FDS, Socialists,
  Agree
That the posting is RIGHT.

No Comment, is CRICKETS,
Just another slam on the UL DFI FDS Socialists,
Because by lack of comments,
they know the statements are RIGHT.

            If not,
A ‘champion’ would be spinning/deflecting/defending/countering it,
A ‘down under’ would be spouting nonsense,
A ‘muppet’ would be throwing out drive by’s.

(Which is also, confirming the statement is, RIGHT)


Remember, a 'count' is only if someone is signed in.
If they are not, the count could be a thousand views,
with no counts showing.

       “Crickets”.  LOL