So……we were told no way Wuhan came from the lab, that it was a natural event from bats, or monkeys etc….. Those of us who doubted that were trashed as conspiracy theorists.

So……we were told Hunter Biden’s laptop was a Russian ploy and those emails implicating Joe were fake and anyone suggesting otherwise was playing right into Russia’s hands.

So….. we’re told the 2020 election was legit and Biden really did win and anyone suggesting otherwise is an election denier. Well?

I'm not surprised a bit, are you??

Best regards,

Birds are real, bat-soup.....................




Best regards,

"Natural immunity, according to E,was fleeting and wimpy."

  Natural immunity means you are "immune" to contracting the virus.  Are you saying some humans are now immune to getting Covid19?  They can not get it?

 But people aren't "safe" from Covid for YEARS by getting it.

 Millions of humans have contracted Covid twice in under 365 days that are not vaccinated.  Millions of humans.  That's not "immunity" in any way, it's not even close to Mumps.  


"Remember how things were before Science agreed with tranny theory?"

 I've not seen any "science" that agrees.



"But I don't care. I see what is going on. The unjabbed who got over covid are not the ones dying."

 This makes sense when you ignore how base-rate works.  There is a possibility that vaccinations should not be used on a certain portion of the population, specifically the ones I mentioned here that you won't read, but ignoring how math works won't help have a discussion about this issue.

The point is you have to discern every news story because bias either purposely or subliminally clouds the view of the presenter when the tell the story. You have to have multiple sources. Now, as a conservative, that’s easy, because I have my preferred new sources, but I get naturally inundated with the ambient news stories that float around me from popular culture. It’s easy for me to see both sides of the coin. It’s very difficult for a leftist liberal who refuses to see or watch anything other than CNN or MSNBC. You’re completely blind to the other side of the coin.

A perfect example is our former friend from Chicago, who used to hide behind our fair and balanced moderator’s skirts. I don’t think I’ve seen more of a one-sided idiot.

So conservatives have a natural advantage, but that also means we need a plan of discernment when we hear stories from our preferred sources. I like Tucker Carlson but I’m very well aware he’s very one-sided. I think he’s generally on to something but he also goes off in these tangents that just aren’t real. I hated Bill O’Reilly with a passion, and I refused to watch Sean Hannity. I don’t think they offer anything of value. I don’t watch Laura Ingram either.

It seemed very logical that Wuhan came from a lab leak, and it seems ridiculous to say we couldn’t talk about it because we were being racist towards Chinese. As soon as I heard that I knew there was something to the story. When a couple of hundred national security advisor signed letter that said Hunter, Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation, I knew it was real. And I know there’s no way Biden won that election fairly. Everyone knows that.

Apply discernment to every new story you hear and try to purposely force out your own biases and arrive a little bit closer to what the truth is. We may never know the exact truth but you can get closer.

Which is why I never went all in on Trump to the way our fair and balanced moderator for example goes all in on grandpa Biden. I know Trump is a liar and a cheat. I’m very well aware of that. I’m also very well aware he was better for me as president than anyone else. So no, I wouldn’t want Donald Trump as a neighbor and I wouldn’t mind Barack Obama as a neighbor. That’s what I mean about separating biased from reality.

"It’s easy for me to see both sides of the coin. It’s very difficult for a leftist liberal who refuses to see or watch anything other than CNN or MSNBC. You’re completely blind to the other side of the coin."

 This same logic applies to anyone that uses the internet to only search specifically for information they want to hear, exclusively on websites they like.  It creates an echo chamber, and those are extremely profitable to those websites and media platforms.  



"Which is why I never went all in on Trump to the way our fair and balanced moderator for example goes all in on grandpa Biden. I know Trump is a liar and a cheat. I’m very well aware of that. I’m also very well aware he was better for me as president than anyone else. So no, I wouldn’t want Donald Trump as a neighbor and I wouldn’t mind Barack Obama as a neighbor. That’s what I mean about separating biased from reality."

 But it's easier to just talk trash about the "other side".

E,
You argued against what is and has been historically true, and you
Were
Wrong.
Just be Wrong. It's okay. You can do it.


 I provided reference for all my numbers, that you won't read.  How are you coming to the conclusion that vaccinated humans are getting Covid more than unvaccinated?  

 You are ignoring base-rate.  You won't even acknowledge how many people you think are vaccinated because you "don't want to be played" so by your math 100% of vaccines are lethal.

 Why would anyone agree to that?