"I disagree, you often are critical of information and sources that you feel are not virtuous.  Then you elaborate on a personal antidote that has no bearing on the subject matter...............
"

 This sounds similar to discounting any document, without reading it, that is perceived to be a "government" source even if it isn't.   Typically when I say a source is inaccurate I provide reference, that is not even looked at.  Why would I ignore when a source is lying or inaccurate?  

 The personal anecdote is applicable in this case as I am using my personal experience regarding a similar event to develop my opinion.  I am not claiming it to be anything other than opinion.  Claiming I do not support something that I said I DO support is beneficial in what way?

Interesting, others have said they have formed a opinion, on their personal experience about a subject.

Yet it has been said:
That, 'opinion', is not valid '

 An opinion is not fact.  I am not claiming my opinion is what factually happened.  As a factual assessment my opinion is not valid.

I'm old enough to remember when people who played along with the delusions of others were called
Enablers.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 03/02/23 at 07:38:37:

So you're what,... 4 years old?
The label,"enabler" is an invention of the Right wing cancel culture.

Anti- gay, black, Mexican, Chinese, trans, woman, science, education, on and on...

What do you like?... Oh yeah, guns, flags, and tRump...

I am against participating in someone else’s delusion by letting a man dressed up as a woman go into the women’s restroom or locker room.

This woman’s testimony, which seem to have been forgotten as the point of this thread, demonstrates there’s a huge number, unquestionably the vast majority, of recent transgender patients, who do not suffer from actual gender dysphoria, but from a social contagion. And there are doctors, nurses and facilities, participating in this lunacy, and cutting off organs and prescribing life changing unalterable drugs to children.

Sure, you can put up a link to those photos. How do you know in 10 years that little girl/boy or boy/girl won’t be filled with regret? You don’t know that, because we don’t have any idea how many are. That’s one of those statistics that are working very hard to keep under cover.

And besides, with this recent rash of this social contagion and this money making business from cutting little girls t!ts off for money, we have no idea what’s going to happen five years from now. Would you like to see a photo or read a story about a transgender teen who regrets her decision and is now stuck with it? Breast removed, drugs given to grow a fake thingy. Do you wanna see that story? Transgender people will never experience a normal sexual act in their entire life. Never. We took that away from them before they even knew it. This is utterly ridiculous. She’s not old enough to get a tattoo, but we’ll change her body forever because her and a bunch of her friends at school read something on Twitter.

Doctors and nurses that participate in this are just absolute f’ing scums as are enablers who like to look at happy little photos, but ignore the horror that comes afterwards.

"...took that away from them before they even knew it..."

In some religions, cutting off a Clit, is perfectly OK.

According to many UL, DFI, FDS Socialists.

No wonder they believe that someone under 18 can make that decision.
Just as they say 16 year olds should be able to vote and only 25 year olds can buy a Gun.


' cut it off, before they even know what it is for '

Serowbot wrote on 03/02/23 at 14:05:21:


I told you, I know someone who went through this and had this girl been here in St Louis and gone to this ‘clinic’, she would have been butchered. It’s terrible what we’re doing and equally terrible people like you defend it.