justin_o_guy2 wrote on 02/24/23 at 07:56:30:

Here's the thing....  America has a worker shortage... it needs an increasing supply of workers to sustain it's tax base, and make the economy thrive.
Companies regularly seek illegal workers (including tRump himself) to fill the void.
Our population is verging on decline.... more deaths than births.
If you want a strong America, you should want growth.
We're not crowded.  
More workers, more consumers, more buyers, more sellers... make a thriving economy.

... but, but, but...   they're brown...
This is the Republican issue.  The browning of America.
It's happening anyway.
White folk have fewer children.
Even without immigration, minority population goes up.
So the real problem is fear of color.

No, Row. You boil my mutherfukkin blood. I don't give one flying FUKK where someone's great grandparents came from, what color they are, none of that matters.. It's who they are. That is what matters. America only needs So Many unskilled workers. Who is coming here? The business owners? The doctors? Nurses?
It's pretty funny watching you lefties vapor lock over the UnJabbed Americans and applaud the border being flooded by, not Just Unjabbed, but unscreened for diseases.
Naah,no conflict in the words and deeds of the left,, Ohh No..
I'm really sick of you telling me I'm a racist. You are not right about. You can fukkoff. I'm really fukking sick of it.. Got it??? Don't even send me r finger wagging BullShitt..

Serowbot wrote on 02/22/23 at 15:25:43:

Are you in charge of advertising on this sight ?
Are the ads offering girls from another country to come live with you,
excoriation, human trafficking,
or just plain SPAM ?.

It's NOT fair,but you know, racists are cheaters,too.

That is one lousy response that can be made for any topic or position that you don't support.


 Easy to say when you ignore that I DO support transporting illegal immigrants to "sanctuary" locations, including Martha's Vineyard and have said that here.

 What evidence do you have that eliminates the potential for duplicitous actions of third party contractors?  The same evidence that I do?  None?

 So my opinion is based off my experiences, I have seen third party contractors lie to get and keep jobs, but I won't sit here pretending my opinion on this matter is fact.  Bottom line is if a human supports transporting illegals to Martha's Vineyard they will be less likely to say contractors might have lied.

 If a human is against transporting illegals to Martha's Vineyard they are more likely to say contractors lied.  In this case "human" means all known humans.

 I don't care, so I think with the zero evidence I have, there is a 50/50 chance.

I wonder what language the waiver was written in,.. and what it explained.

I doubt it said "we're sending you across the to Florida so that the Governor there can send you to a town in a state that's not expecting you and is unprepared to deal with you, and it will be a thousand miles from your immigration appointment"
"You good with that?"
 

It probably said..."By getting on this bus I waive all rights to sue you"
....and they probably had no idea or choice in matter

Let’s bring this back on point: https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p382

The rush to affirm.

Sarah Palmer, a paediatrician in private practice in Indiana, is one of five coauthors of a 2022 resolution submitted to the AAP’s leadership conference asking that it revisit the policy after “a rigorous systematic review of available evidence regarding the safety, efficacy, and risks of childhood social transition, puberty blockers, cross sex hormones and surgery.” In practice, Palmer told The BMJ, clinicians define “gender affirming” care so broadly that “it’s been taken by many people to mean go ahead and do anything that affirms. One of the main things I’ve seen it used for is masculinising chest surgery, also known as mastectomy in teenage patients.” The AAP has told The BMJ that all policy statements are reviewed after five years and so a “revision is under way,” based on its experts’ own “robust evidence review.”

Palmer says, “I’ve seen a quick evolution, from kids with a very rare case of gender dysphoria who were treated with a long course of counselling and exploration before hormones were started,” to treatment progressing “very quickly—even at the first visit to gender clinic—and there’s no psychologist involved anymore.”

WebsterMark wrote on 02/27/23 at 05:09:38:


If that's true, then we need to backtrack.  It's not something to be taken lightly but I find it hard to believe, and the current outrage seems driven by phobia and prejudice rather than concern for well being.
JMHO