I happened to see a like to the trial in Arizona about the Governor election and from the 15 minutes or so I saw, in which both sides had an opportunity to question witnesses, I think Kari Lake has a point. That election was messed up. It wouldn’t surprise me if they ordered a new one.

It would surprise 50% of Arizona.

Serowbot wrote on 12/22/22 at 09:25:06:

Why ?

Their is NO REQUIREMENT, to be a USA Citizen to vote in AZ !

So anybody, that is ANYBODY, including Illegal's, get to vote for a party, that will give them everything they want for FREE !

"... A registrant who attests to being a citizen but fails to provide proof of citizenship and whose citizenship is not otherwise verified will be eligible to vote only in federal elections (known as being a "federal only" voter). In April 2022, the legislature passed a law requiring proof of citizenship to be eligible to vote in presidential elections (2492); however, this law has not yet gone into effect ..."

"... A law taking effect in 2023 requires voters to share proof of citizenship to cast ballots by mail or vote in presidential elections. It is being challenged in court ..."

"... A law taking effect in 2023 requires voters to share proof of citizenship to cast ballots by mail…”

"... It is being challenged in court ..."

WebsterMark wrote on 12/23/22 at 04:08:21:

You don't think claiming election fraud relates to tRump?

You don't want it to,... but that don't change reality.

Serowbot wrote on 12/23/22 at 07:11:47:


When Hilary claimed election fraud in 2016, the corporate media and entertainment culture repeated it as fact. When Stacy Abrams lost, she repeated the claim, it to was accepted as fact. Only Trumpand Lake’s claims are treated as fabrications.

The small section I watched revealed some interesting situations occurred that are hard to ignore.

No-go for Kari Lake.

“The Court cannot accept speculation or conjecture in place of clear and convincing evidence," Thompson said.

In the ruling, the judge acknowledged the "anger and frustration" of voters who were inconvenienced in the election but noted that setting aside the results of an election "has never been done in the history of the United States."

That’s the key. That’s a big hurdle to get over. But from what I saw during the trial, it was either incompetence or deliberate on the part of those who organized and conducted the election.

So, either incompetence or deliberate actions likely changed the outcome of a very close election since Lake’s voters were more likely to cast ballots on Election Day.

And before you call BS Sew, remember how your panties bunch up when talking how the tiny, almost zero, number of people who don’t have a government issued ID ( who choose to not get one) affect elections.

So, did the Democrats steal another election? I’d say the odds are yes.

From my boy Elon this morning:
We should think of various explanations for any given event in terms of probabilities, not certainties.

Those who don’t allow any questioning of the narrative at all are full of 💩.

More tomorrow, it’s Christmas today. No one’s awake but me so I’m going to shake my presents under the tree and maybe pull off a piece of tape or two so I can see what I’m getting later.

This is akin getting pulled over for speeding and getting away with it because the officer cant prove you were speeding intentionally.



 Or its akin to people that don't like you saying you were speeding and the court saying that humans claiming you did something, is not equal to evidence that you actually did it.