Probably nobody will be looking at this. Bad title.
Double? Yeah, IDK about That, but it's worth the cost.
So IF you have more plants, doesn't That say something about the survivability of the environment? Yeah, that is a real question. The REEEE about Muh Environment boils down to the survival of our species.  I don't believe we are being threatened except by the people who want to control us. Might hafta kick a window outta the ant arm


https://disturbeddeputy.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/image-363.png

For all I know that is just a heater. I went looking for greenhouse CO2 generators and there are plenty, but I didn't see That one.
The POINT is, right there.

Aaand that will not be a topic
Nor will railroad change a mind.

But, if I elected a dead guy, a near brain dead guy,, and my leader could barely read a prompter, and WE STILL WON,, why would I care about the obvious?

It's a lot warmer than it was. It Was pretty much covered in ice. Remnants of buildings in the ocean, because it Was dry land because so much water was piled up, solid ice,
So, is there some reason to believe that the environmental influences that thawed out the planet several times stopped warming the planet as soon as humanity was able to thrive? Is there any reason to believe that warming is finished?
Is there any scientific evidence that Earth was ever warmer than it is now?

Well, Yes,yes there is.

why do I heat my home?

Idk,E, why Do you heat your home?

I'm a bit nervous asking.

No, E, you are twisting things.
Co2 makes For more plants. Satellites show increased coverage by plants while co2 has increased. Plants are beneficial and shade earth, cooling soil temperatures.
You tell me what I'm doing and frankly, I'm surprised, because it's Not what I'm doing.
How you manage to interpret it the way you do is surprising.


How do you manage to focus so narrowly?


GUESS WHAT??
THE WORLD HAS BEEN WARMER THAN IT IS RIGHT FUKKING NOW.

And remnants of buildings are under water.

Ignore everything
Split hairs
Innacurate accusations

Fukk me.

Says Who?
You?

As I see it,... it's not so much the change in temperature,  that's the problem,... it's the speed of change.
The change as you point out, is natural,... the speed is not.
Coastal cities will not be able to adjust that quickly and it will be expensive.... same for farms.
We can naturally migrate over time.
Sudden migration will cause huge economic and health problems.
Billions of people cannot shift that fast.

Serowbot wrote on 11/20/22 at 07:04:54:


How can you possibly know that? I’ve heard this for 20 years now. Miami was supposed to be underwater by now.

And no one really believes this because look at all of the high profile climate change activists who are multimillionaires and buy coastal homes. If they really believed in a short period of time, All those terrible things were going to happen,  they wouldn’t buy it. That’s ridiculous.

There are currently government programs that insure the uninsurable coastal properties at great discount.  Originally intended to assist fishermen and working class people that made their livings off the sea.  Now, it's a haven for the rich, and it needs to change,  Working class folk were driven off by high land valuations and tax assessments.
As long as we tax payers are subsiding the rich and their beach homes they'll be more than happy to build and rebuild.. ...on our dime.

John Stossel did a whole program on it, all the while gloating over his taking advantage of it himself.
You can probably Google it.