Eegore wrote on 12/16/22 at 06:19:37: I agree, but that does not mean you have the "right" to use Twitter or any other company's private property. Government misconduct does not give you rights to the private property they used to do it.
I didn't say I had the 'right', my position is they are a state actor. In addition, the government are violating peoples rights.
If the government merely acquiesces in the performance of an act by a private individual or organization it is not state action, but if the government coerces, influences, or encourages the performance of the act, it is state action (Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830 (1982));
If the government merely enters into a contract with an individual or organization for the goods or services, the actions of the private party are not state action, but if the government and the private party enter into a "joint enterprise" or a "symbiotic relationship" with each other it is state action (Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715 (1961));
Best regards,