I read all the info Musk put out last night and it’s not a surprise. Twitter management intervened and prevented the Washington Post story detailing Joe Biden’s involvement with the his brother and son’s business of which he was fully involved, from being posted. They even went so far as to prevent direct messages on the top from one person to another which was a step previously only taken in cases such as spreading child porn.

But the best comment I read was from someone who said “Yes, Twitter management stepped in and lied to protect Joe Biden from his criminal dealings but it’s important to remember with a very few notable exceptions, major network news and print publications were just as complicit. They went out of their way to lie and even fabricate fake news to deflect away from Biden and turn an illegitimate focus on to Trump.”

That means you Lester Holt.

So, bottom line question: is Joe Biden an illegitimate President? Was the election tainted?

The only answer is yes. I believe I’ve read it would only had taken 23000 votes over 4 states to change the outcome. If Twitter (and Facebook) had let people freely exchange information, if the major news stations had at least pretended to act out their 4th estate role, no way Biden gets elected. No way.

For all the emphasis on Hunter's laptop,... it will never be used as evidentiary in a court of law.  FBI has determined that the chain of custody cannot be verified and there has been tampering to the files both additive and subtractive.
No one can know what is original and what has been planted.

Eegore wrote on 12/03/22 at 06:26:35:


You are so completely wrong on this.

Company decides because a government agency said
Make that go away?

 According to Musk Twitter approached the Government.  So if I go to you and ask if you want control of part of my property, did you come to me?

 If Twitter were a public utility I'd see the argument.
 

"This is what you’re not getting. The widespread and universal use of social media and it’s influence basically makes it a de facto public square."

 Then why is it ok for Truth or Parler?  Where's the complaints about their unfair treatment of people who choose to use their property?

 If Twitter had banned Biden and still had Trump on it would be having this discussion even?

 Until Constitutional law changes, or alterations are made to the 1st Amendment, these private companies do not have to protect your rights.

When a partnership is formed, and collaboration & cooperation exists.  An argument can be made they are participating in the capacity of a state actor.

In United States constitutional law, a state actor is a person who is acting on behalf of a governmental body, and is therefore subject to limitations imposed on government by the United States Constitution.

Best regards,

Maybe that is the next step. Government using corporate to further their agenda is government taking away our rights, using a third party.


Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the GOP ranking member on the Committee, made the remarks in a Friday appearance on Fox News after Twitter’s new owner Elon Musk dropped part one of the so-called “Twitter Files,” an expose of the inner workings of Twitter’s censorship machine.

“Every employee at Twitter who was involved in suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story will have an opportunity to come before Congress and explain their actions to the American people,” Comer told program host Sean Hannity.