Serowbot wrote on 12/17/22 at 07:27:10:



Well look who is a proponent of election integrity............

First, the article said their are links to Russia.  What does that mean, hackers, kids, FSB??

Moreover, that is a significant difference between our government making efforts to affect an election as opposed to an alleged foreign entities.

Also, that was 7 or 8 years ago, that is some serious 'howaabboouuttissmmm'...............

Best regards,

Eegore wrote on 12/18/22 at 10:10:22:



Did I say it didn't happen?  NNOOooo....

That was a deflection to a difficult question by making a counter-accusation or raising a different issue.

Best regards,

Eegore wrote on 12/17/22 at 07:24:52:



Wrong, there is a significant difference.

Up to 2-3 years ago, one knew, what group/people’s, that POV was from.
One knew if it was real, or propaganda, simply because of its source.

Today, some Social Media’s, LIED.
Lied by omission of Fact, Lied saying they were Fair. Lied implying no outside force/group, (like the FBI) influenced the, ‘reports’.

50 years ago no one said, ‘Don’t eat Tide Pods’, Yet today the UL FDS Socialists have to put ‘warnings’ on everything, (like shampoo labeling, ‘Do Not Drink).

Years ago, the DIF’s that ‘drank Shampoo’,  just cleaned up the gene pool. Today the Socialists have to, ‘protect’ everybody. So they survive, and believe the Lying Social media and the ‘Told What To Say’, major broadcast media. All for the goal to have more DFI’s, so they can vote the way they are TOLD to do, instead of thinking for themselves.

The  difference between then and now,  is not,  effectiveness,  it is, Lying,  Subversion,  and a handful of people, TELLING YOU, what to think and how to vote. And that can be done ONLY, when there are a significant number of DFI’s, who can’t think for themselves.

"It's just a statement that Russia saw how dangerous Hillary would be. Putin is smart enough to know how much more unstable the world would be with her as opposed to Trump."

 This is also silly.  There is not plausible reason for anyone on this forum to know why Russia does things or what Putin thinks.  There is a ton of information available to them that will never be available to us.


"Retweeting something that came from a Russian bot? As IF someone knew it was from a Russian bot? How does that mean anything?"

 Because it influences public response.  Of course believing what is on Twitter is the real problem, but it is effective and that is why countries dump all the money they do into creating false information online.


"Agreeing with something that is true is not promoting a lie. Where it comes from means exactly nothing, if it's correct, it's correct."

 And if it's not correct?   If the post is a lie, would that be promoting a lie?
 

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/elon-musk-says-almost-every-conspiracy-t...


“To be totally frank, almost every conspiracy theory that people had about Twitter turned out to be true,” Musk said.

“Is there a conspiracy theory about Twitter that didn’t turn out to be true? So far, they’ve all turned out to be true. If not more true than people thought.”

Best regards,

Its a private company people think is a public utility.

 Anyone that thinks Twitter is a fact based source deserves to be upset over the lies they see there.

Turns out, it was a coordinated effort, using retired spooks, and Twitter was Paid,, If it's that pervasive, is it a rogue element of or is that The Government?


ALL of the above.............


Best regards,