"Their is nothing subjective about the Brandon (POTUS), Walensky (CDC), Maddow (Media), & Fauci (NIAID) lying in their own words.

Best regards,"


 So the video I originally watched was not the one linked here.  I'm not sure  how I ended up on another one.

 This video basically says what I have been saying.  The vaccine doesn't "stop" the spread of Covid, it does however reduce and only the word "reduce" with the exemption of all other known words, symptoms according to today's clinical data.  

 The question I have is why is it normal to be critical of the statements made for pro-vaccine, but anything anti-vaccine is to be considered fact until proven wrong, then debated without even looking at the information?  Shouldn't we be looking at all information this way?

 The issue of issuing mandatory vaccinations due to the idea that it "prevents" spread should absolutely be addressed.  Something along the lines of what happened with the oxycontin suits.  The reduction of medical center census loads would be applicable, but prevention would not be.