Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
A decade of lies (Read 296 times)
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 8379

Re: A decade of lies
Reply #60 - 07/19/22 at 19:38:30
 

Trust me Eegore, I’m from the government.

 Again with this.  Should I re-post the breakdown of my references on this site showing only 11% are from actual Government sources?

 I never said we should trust the Government.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 13168

Gender: male
Re: A decade of lies
Reply #61 - 07/20/22 at 04:34:39
 
Eegore wrote on 07/19/22 at 19:38:30:
Trust me Eegore, I’m from the government.

 Again with this.  Should I re-post the breakdown of my references on this site showing only 11% are from actual Government sources?

 I never said we should trust the Government.


It was a weak attempt at humor. Again, you gonna be a riot at a party.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 13168

Gender: male
Re: A decade of lies
Reply #62 - 07/20/22 at 04:43:23
 
Serowbot wrote on 07/19/22 at 15:09:45:
You have redefined the word weapon, and riot, so that you can claim the Left reports lies.
You deny that Trump lost the election, so the Left perpetuates a lie.
The Right has it's own dictionary and history book.
In this book Hitler was a liberal, Putin is a good guy, Trump is a brilliant businessman, and guns have nothing to do with gun deaths.
Roll Eyes  


I did not redefine the word weapon. I’ve said when anyone refers to a group of people who are armed they are almost always referring to them as armed with firearms. Broken flag pole sticks are weapons but you’re not going to overthrow the United States government with broken flag pole sticks.

I do not believe Biden would have won if the election was conducted in a historical manner and not by the changes made by state legislators using Covid as a cover. That’s true.

The left perpetrate so many lies it would be impossible to list them all or even keep them straight.

1) The socialist name in Hitler’s party is kind of a giveaway.
2) Nobody said Putin was a good guy.
3) Trump is a brilliant businessman otherwise you would’ve never even known him. He would not have been on Johnny Carson, he would not have been on SNL, etc... The Democrats would not have been going to him for money. And you would never even heard of the man if he was not a brilliant businessman. I’ve slept in a Donald Trump Hotel and eating at‘s restaurants. I never ate one of his father‘s restaurant to stay the money his hotels. I’ve never stayed in a SEW  or ate at one of your restaurants.
Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. The prevalence of guns obviously increases the likelihood of a death by gun. Nobody denies that. The prevalence of alcohol, drugs, freeways, fast cars, motorcycles, they kill people too. We accept risk every day we get out of bed.

But at least my dictionary doesn’t say men can be women and women can be men it doesn’t say it’s a good idea to cut the boobs off of young girls who are confused, or hack a little boy’s pecker off, it doesn’t say a disease which targets a very small demographic can be used to just devastate children’s early education. That’s your dictionary.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 8379

Re: A decade of lies
Reply #63 - 07/20/22 at 05:18:12
 

"I did not redefine the word weapon."

 You redefined the word "armed".  When you say nobody on Jan 6th was "armed" that means the people that got hit with the hockey stick, or sprayed with bear spray were assaulted by someone that was unarmed.

 I do agree that considering this an "armed insurrection" is inaccurate, but we don't have to go so far as to deny that a few people there used objects to assault others.  Those few people were armed.  They were not part of an armed insurrection.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
MnSpring
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Younger than most
people my age.

Posts: 9376
Minn
Gender: male
Re: A decade of lies
Reply #64 - 07/20/22 at 15:24:28
 
Eegore wrote on 07/20/22 at 05:18:12:
You redefined the word "armed".  When you say nobody on Jan 6th was "armed" that means the people that got hit with the hockey stick, or sprayed with bear spray were assaulted by someone that was unarmed.
 I do agree that considering this an "armed insurrection" is inaccurate, but we don't have to go so far as to deny that a few people there used objects to assault others.  Those few people were armed.
 They were not part of an armed insurrection."


         Perhaps you could PICK one !

From footage, and reports,
the only 'armed' person that shot a Firearm.
Was the one that KILLED a person,
who was NO Threat,
had NO gun,
and was NOT ARMED.
Back to top
 
 

Ben Franklin once said: "If you give up a freedom, for the sake of security, you will have neither".
Which is More TRUE, today, than yesterday.('06, S-40, Stock) well, mostly .
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 8379

Re: A decade of lies
Reply #65 - 07/20/22 at 16:18:52
 
Perhaps you could PICK one !

From footage, and reports,
the only 'armed' person that shot a Firearm.
Was the one that KILLED a person,
who was NO Threat,
had NO gun,
and was NOT ARMED.
 



 What is there to PICK?  

 Webstermark has indicated nobody on Jan 6 was "armed".  

 The man with the hockey stick, the man with the gun, the man with the bear spray were all "armed".  
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
*****
Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 13168

Gender: male
Re: A decade of lies
Reply #66 - 07/23/22 at 05:09:07
 
It’s absolutely ridiculous to refer to the January 6 rioters as armed insurrectionist as if there was a legitimate possibility of bringing down United States government. That’s the ridiculous part. When you use the phrase armed you’re using it purposely in attempt to make the situation seem far more dire than it actually was.

No, I’m not watching the January 6th circle jerk but I read the testimony of some of Mike Pences staff who said they were calling their families because they  feared for their lives. That’s utter nonsense. The weird dude with the horn hat was gonna walk in and kill everyone with a broken flag pole, walk back to the White House and take over the government? Seriously?

Have you ever heard of or have you ever referred to the protesters outside the White House on those nights of the George Floyd riots as being armed? No, of course not. Do you ever hear of the antifa riders carrying umbrellas sticks and things like that as being armed? No of course not. Armed is the phrase almost exclusively reserved for firearms. The only time it’s not is when you’re trying to overexaggerate the danger for political purposes.

The guy who tried to kill the New York governor. I’ve seen articles that say he had a knife. I did read one article that said he was armed with a knife. I’ve not seen any articles on January 6 that said they were armed with broken flag poles. They just say they were armed. That’s a lie and they’re purposely trying to inflate the seriousness and you’re going right along with it. Have at it.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 8379

Re: A decade of lies
Reply #67 - 07/23/22 at 05:58:59
 

"When you use the phrase armed you’re using it purposely in attempt to make the situation seem far more dire than it actually was."

 When I say the guy with the hockey stick was armed with a hockey stick and not part of an insurrection, what part of that is incorrect?

 When you say "nobody was armed" what part of that is incorrect?


"Have you ever heard of or have you ever referred to the protesters outside the White House on those nights of the George Floyd riots as being armed? No, of course not. Do you ever hear of the antifa riders carrying umbrellas sticks and things like that as being armed? No of course not. Armed is the phrase almost exclusively reserved for firearms. The only time it’s not is when you’re trying to overexaggerate the danger for political purposes."


 Yes, I have heard, and would refer to them as armed.  I would not claim, as you have on Jan 6th, that "nobody was armed".  Some people were armed at all of these locations.

 Nothing about where when or political affiliation changes the definition of "armed".  
 
 As for "They" I don't really care as I do not use mainstream news as a source of evidence.  When I am having a conversation with someone, and they tell me any human with an object in their hand used as a weapon against another human is "unarmed" I will disagree.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
justin_o_guy2
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

What happened?

Posts: 55279
East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.
Re: A decade of lies
Reply #68 - 07/23/22 at 07:20:07
 
When GUNS are the topic..
Considered armed and dangerous.
It's a gun
Not a stick

People just standing around talking, the most common understanding is gun when Armed is in the conversation.
I'm sure you knew what was meant. Or,if you're suffering from conFEWZzzion, ask. Your constant need to put sideboards on the conversation, suddenly, you have derailed the conversation and instead of having a conversation about the event, Noow it's not about the event, it's about how We talk about the event. The hair splitting is Old.
Back to top
 
 

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke.
  IP Logged
Eegore
Serious Thumper
*****
Online

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 8379

Re: A decade of lies
Reply #69 - 07/23/22 at 09:31:41
 
"When GUNS are the topic..
Considered armed and dangerous.
It's a gun
Not a stick"


 If a stick is used to assault someone why are they suddenly "unarmed" only on Jan 6th?

 Why argue lies with lies?

 If "armed insurrection" is misleading, duplicitous, dishonest etc. so is claiming "Nobody was armed".

 Why does the Not-an-Insurrection crowd get to alter facts and not the Pro-Insurrection crowd?

 None of what I am saying stops the conversation.  If I think humans assaulting other humans with sticks and bear spray are "armed" and should not be called "unarmed" it will not derail anything.

 If you think that guy with a hockey stick hitting people was unarmed go ahead.  We still will agree that this was not an armed insurrection.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Serowbot
YaBB Moderator
ModSquad
*****
Offline

OK.... so what's the
speed of dark?

Posts: 28696
Tucson Az
Gender: male
Re: A decade of lies
Reply #70 - 07/23/22 at 10:43:24
 
Kyle Rittenhouse shot and killed unarmed men.
Back to top
 
 

Ludicrous Speed !... ... Huh...
  IP Logged
pg
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline



Posts: 5273
In Transit
Re: A decade of lies
Reply #71 - 07/23/22 at 15:26:51
 
The one trying to decapitate him with a skateboard, the one with the Glock pointed at him, or the pedo trying to disarm him?  

Regardless he will receive hundreds of millions..........

Best regards,
Back to top
 
 

I don't make the rules, I just know what they are.....




  IP Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
10/07/24 at 09:32:40



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › A decade of lies


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.