But again, this is the key point that you and Sew are ignoring. The conservative commentators who doubted the story are not repeating those doubts. This is different than all the other situations I mentioned previously where liberal commentators repeat the lies over and over despite obvious evidence. How many liberal commentators still say five people were killed on January 6 and that an officer was in ne of those killed by the insurrectionist?


 I understand that, and already said I do not have a team evaluating this since I do not use any mainstream media for "news" since they are historically very inaccurate compared to other methods.  Last time I put forth a breakdown of FOX broadcast information here I was told it was inaccurate without one person even looking at it, so why should I run through thousands of transcripts of both FOX and whatever is defined as "Liberal Media"?

 Both "sides" report news as needed to gain profit.  

Eegore wrote on 07/16/22 at 06:06:36:


Yep. That is business.

Howsoever, LIBERAL sites,
have 'proven' themselves,
to NOT tell the truth.
And when that info has been proven wrong,
they CONTINUE to LIE/MISLEAD.

Where CONSERVATIVE sites,
  have 'proven',
they let a story/information go,
 when it is a LIE/Misleading.

"... I do not have a team evaluating this since  ...
...  Last time I put forth a breakdown of FOX broadcast information here I was told it was inaccurate ... "

I believe you have not, "... have a team evaluating...", because it will, 'prove', Conservative news/sights/information,
LIES a LOT LESS, then a Liberal counterpart.

"... without one person even looking at it, ..."

This is known to you, how ?

Eegore wrote on 07/16/22 at 11:04:50:


You can get into,
 someone else's,
   web-sight
and then look at all their stats ?

WOW !

You can get into,
someone else's,
  web-sight
and then look at all their stats ?

WOW !


 Incorrect.  I can look at my own links and see who accesses those.

[url]https://anncoulter.substack.com/p/oh-hes-an-immigrant?utm_source=substack&utm_me

dium=email#play[/url]

I tried to

A: Watch it
And
2: fix your link

Is there an another place to see it besides Twatter?

WebsterMark wrote on 07/18/22 at 19:18:28:


And perfect timing. Saw this story today and while it takes a while to find…..guess what?
https://www.foxnews.com/us/nyc-sees-disturbing-sex-crime-trend-police-hunt-se...

Trust me Eegore, I’m from the government.

Serowbot wrote on 07/19/22 at 15:09:45:


You have redefined the word weapon,
and riot,
Be precise, from What to What ?

You deny that Trump lost the election
He won, it was fixed, end of story.

The Right has it's own dictionary and history book.
Exactly what is that ?

In this book Hitler was a liberal, Putin is a good guy
Again, EXACTLY, where does it say that ?

Trump is a brilliant businessman
 Lot better than you, Eegor, and me put together.

guns have nothing to do with gun deaths.
Kinda Like;
Cars have nothing to do with automobile deaths ?
Eating only sweets/fat/processed food have nothing to do with death by Heart attack/Diabetes ?
Ingesting Poison has nothing to do with Suicide ?
Signs saying, 'No Guns Here', have nothing to do with Mass Shootings ?