That’s only partially true. I’ve proven time and time again, Fox is far more accurate and fair than CNN or MSNBC. It’s not even a close comparison.

 I'm not sure what "proof" you have provided but I do not follow any of them close enough to check what you consider proof.  In most cases the information I cross reference with "the news" shows that "the news" is typically incorrect or lacking a ton of supporting information thus altering context.

 Like this thread here, FOX broadcasts claims it was made up, you obviously accepted it as fact, but research into court documents cross referenced with police reports show it is real.  FOX minus one, again, in my book.

 So I tune into FOX tomorrow for what reason?  They aren't even providing the basic information I can look up in less time than it takes to watch one show.

 So as I have said many times, I do not utilize mainstream media as a source of reliable information.

[b] I am familiar with the names you listed, they were reported in the news.  The fact that they are names in the news says nothing about the accuracy of reporting[/b]

If you don’t understand the consequences of those names and the stories around them, then you believe all the lies you hear on CNN and MSNBC not to mention 95% of MSM.

You, have to, 'Check' something.
to determine if it is 'Proof'.

 Proof to me.  This thread here should be a good enough example of why I don't just take anything told to me as "proof" of something.

 Lets break this down so we are using my words and not words other people insert to alter the meaning of what I say.

"I do not follow any of them close enough
to check what you consider proof."


 This means I, and only I with the exemption of all other know humans, do not "follow" or otherwise consistently utilize, read, have read, look at, or hear posts made by Webstermark specific to this topic and only this topic with the exemption of all other topics.  

 Since I do not follow those posts or the subject(s) of those posts I can not check the accuracy of posts Webstermark, and only Webstermark, in exclusivity, with the exemption of all other known humans - to include myself - would consider to be "proof" by his and only his assessment.


"Then only after you, 'check' that thing,
it can be considered 'Proof' or not ?"

 "Proof" in general is up to the forum member to decide for themselves.  For instance a picture of a quote from George Washington is "proof" to some, while being blatantly false to others.

 7 years of agricultural environment testing, satellite imagery, independent thermal testing at 3 levels of atmospheric measurement, soil analysis, movement of soil to controlled locations, water testing, seed testing and now over 20.3 Million data point entries of environmental measurement compared to equal number of years of 3-stage verified agricultural yields is "proof" to one member that this one location should use a specific global weather model.

 To another member a walk once a year in a different location in the country is "proof" that all that data is not indicative increased yields, and the warmer global modeling is not something that another forum member can "see".
 

That 10 year old was raped: By who?

 Gershon Fuentes, is charged with the crime.  

 While it may be proven that he is not the criminal in question, the girl is real, her travel is real, her issue is real.

"Is that the Undocumented Immigrant,
who is from Guatemala,
who is in the United States illegally,
Who SNAKED in,
who has been 'coddled', by 'sanctuary' policies ?"


 Since the story is supposedly a manufactured tragedy that only:

the VAST amount of shepol that believe, the,
    "Told What To Say", Media

says then no I'd say he isn't.

And by the way, there’s no such thing as an undocumented immigrant. That’s an illegal alien. That’s someone who broke into the country to steal benefits.

OK, you believe, Gershon Fuentes
Is Not a Undocumented Immigrant,
who is Not in the United States illegally,
who has Not been 'coddled', by 'sanctuary' policies ?

 No.  People who think this is a fake story might since none of this is real.  So far nobody that called this fake acknowledged it to be real.


And your proof is because it is;
"...supposedly a manufactured tragedy ..."

 I didn't call this, or support the idea of this being a manufactured tragedy.

Nobody’s making up anything in this case. An illegal alien raped a 10 year old multiple times and in a fluke, she got pregnant. The parents for whatever reason, bad advice perhaps or political activists who knows, felt they had legal issues if they didn’t leave Ohio for treatment.

Puddinhead, who lies with practically every sentence, used the situation for a political attack. No one could find evidence of such a crime because any doctor would be obligated to report this. So because Puddinhead lies and makes crap like this up all the time, some were suspicious.

But again, this is the key point that you and Sew are ignoring. The conservative commentators who doubted the story are not repeating those doubts. This is different than all the other situations I mentioned previously where liberal commentators repeat the lies over and over despite obvious evidence. How many liberal commentators still say five people were killed on January 6 and that an officer was in ne of those killed by the insurrectionist?