"This one really wasn't to difficult, all kinds of devices work without being connected - Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, cellular radio frequencies or cell phones."

 This is true, I should have been more clear that non-connected devices have zero connection.  They are known as "rocks" or otherwise a machine that requires a physical memory device be inserted to the machine.

 I still haven't seen evidence showing actual manipulation.  I even talked with a few guys that went to Lindell's thing and they were pissed.  He basically had nothing and told them to "figure it out" which was basically interpreted as make nothing into something.

 In CO we had this big deal about election fraud and the video footage literally showed the people that were claiming there was no way X-process could happen in 47 seconds doing it themselves, in 47 seconds.  

 I don't have a problem with examining these things for weaknesses, but the Dominion case was nothing more than a guy saying it happened on a podcast with zero evidence presented, even to this day.

Please aware that door can swing in more than one direction.
 

 Sure it can, but I prefer the direction that isn't conjecture and analogy if I am going to say there is "proof".  What kind of world would I be living in if everything I think is true, is actually true?

Eegore wrote on 07/08/22 at 15:21:13:

Let's see, you; 'talked with a few guys'
That you said; "went to Lindell's thing"
Then you said; "He basically had nothing"
 (biased on what you were told)
Then you said, they said;
  "told them to "figure it out" "
Then you interpeted; "make nothing into something"

That is your Proof ?

OK Got it !

Serowbot wrote on 07/09/22 at 11:34:57:



No no, he plays that card when he gets backed into a corner or has no other move.    How about the extraordinary claim of Russian collusion.  Yeah, his political opponent started and paid for that one?  Or perhaps the golden showers......  No I don't remember ant posts about we need exemplary proof.......

Best regards

"Let's see, you; 'talked with a few guys'
That you said; "went to Lindell's thing"
Then you said; "He basically had nothing"
(biased on what you were told)
Then you said, they said;
 "told them to "figure it out" "
Then you interpeted; "make nothing into something"

That is your Proof ?

OK Got it !"

 No.  I never said it was "proof" of anything.  I said it was the information I have.  The only thing it proves is that Lindell's claims were false.  Not one person has ever used his information data to show fraud, that should mean something.

 Of the tangible information I have access to about election fraud, none of it so far points to the outcomes that would exist if it were practical.

 One thing that stood out to me regarding the 2020 election was that election fraud in general, across the country wasn't the issue, just election fraud in locations that would equal a win.

 If I were the POTUS I'd be worried about all of it.

Pick one.

 It proves Lindell's claims were false.

 It does not prove election fraud did or did not happen.  So it is not "My" "Proof" of anything fraud related.

 It is however proof Lindell did not have the information he claimed he did.