One person who is awaiting his trial reported his benefits were canceled.

Also, how does this site define proof for the purpose of a supporting argument?  Certainly not a headline or story from a media group that doesn't align with someone's views, perhaps fraudulent reporting by a government agency, an NGO?  I don't think a clear cut answer exists.

Best regards,

Eegore wrote on 07/06/22 at 06:12:39:


Have you seen where someone who took the, 'vaccine',
and still got Covid ?

Before it was absolutely undeniably demonstrated to be False, every voice out there was hyping the jab as safe AND EFFECTIVE. Take the jab, now you will not get the woohoo Flu.

"Before it was absolutely undeniably demonstrated to be False, every voice out there was hyping the jab as safe AND EFFECTIVE. Take the jab, now you will not get the woohoo Flu."


 Yeah Billy broke a window too.  But we are talking about the window Bobby broke.

 As I said, this is about members on this forum in exclusivity with the exemption of all other know humans.

 Humans on this forum insisted that hydroxychloroquine is a "proven cure" when no known human has been "cured" by taking it.  How is hydroxychloroquine a cure if people that take it still get Covid?

 Drudging up some other comment about a different medication from someone that isn't on this forum is no different than providing a video of people who are not prosecuted for crimes, but trying to use the video as evidence.

"Rules for getting a drug classified as
Emergency Use
Can't have an alternative."


 This is not true.  EAU is about availability and risk aversion, not "cures" in any way shape or form.

"For an EUA to be issued for a vaccine, for which there is adequate manufacturing information to ensure quality and consistency, FDA must determine that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks of the vaccine."


"An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines"


 Not one mention of curing the disease is in the totality of the EUA framework.

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authoriza...



"You can beat your keyboard to pieces trying to gaslight me into believing things that go counter to what I have watched over the last years. It's NOT gonna work."

 Watch all day long.  I don't think what any one human sees is equal to what all humans experience.  As long as you refuse to observe things you don't agree with they won't be part of your observed reality.  Also I have said many times I do not care what you believe and am not trying to change your mind.

 I won't however sit here and agree with you that EUA "requires" a vaccine be a "cure" when it very obviously does not.  

 Or any of the other stuff you wont even read, but defend, even when other people do the math for you and try to show you how that math is categorically impossible.  

 Politicians lied, but not because the FDA requires EAU be for a "cure".  Most likely they lied because it works.  

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 07/07/22 at 07:44:16:



Yes, LLLOOOOTTTTTTTTSSSS of people said that.

Best regards,

"How is the, 'vaccine' a PROVEN cure,
when  people that take it,
still get Covid?"

 It isn't.

 The difference is people here on this forum argued that hydroxychloroquine is a "proven cure".

 I never said the vaccine is a cure.  

 So to be specific, how is hydroxychloroquine a "proven cure" as claimed here multiple times and defended as such on this specific forum and only on this forum with the exemption of all other known forums, when the people who take it still get the disease?