MILF. I didn’t wanna put that in a title heading and get edited out immediately!

I’m old enough to remember when Sarah Palin, Hall of Fame MILF, was blamed for some nutcase shooting some congresswoman in Arizona. It was a lie from the very beginning. The kid was a nut, he felt like he’s been slighted by the congresswoman, and the advertisement that they claimed drove this nutcase to shoot her was a year old and the kid never saw it. But that didn’t matter, she was still at fault.

So using that logic Chuck Schumer, is guilty and to blame for the guy arrested yesterday before attacking Brett Kavanaugh‘s family in his home.

I can’t believe anybody would argue with me. I mean Sarah Palin took the New York Times to court and lost so it must have been her fault.

Bot,

Can you explain why,
Sarah Palin, was at fault.

And Chuck Schumer, is not ?

Or was it just a 'political' move ?

If I invested the time, I could find 100 worse from the other side related to either Trump or W. Or Ted Cruz or Rand Paul etc.

WebsterMark wrote on 06/09/22 at 10:06:45:


"Don't retreat, reload"
Cross hairs to mark political targets
"Get on target for history"
"Shoot a fully automatic M16"

How about one?  Just show me one.
And I'll show you Sen Cruz cooking bacon on an M16 barrel.
How asinine is that?  

"IDK, is calling a middle aged woman sexually attractive an insult?"

 The language not the intent.

Women call me a DILF all the time and I don’t mind.

A pretty good response from whoever she was. She touches on a truth that goes unspoken or unnoticed by most and that has to do with the infamous one to 10 scale.

If you put up pictures of a woman and ask 1000 men to rate her, the numbers are going to be fairly close. They’ll be a small deviation but for the most part, the ratings gonna be relatively consistent within a point  too. There’s gonna be very few cases where someone rates one woman and eight and someone else writes her a two. That’s just not gonna happen.

However, put up pictures of a man and ask 1000 women and the ratings will be all over the place. Sure you’re gonna have a few that are universally regarded very high are very low but the middle range is gonna be way more spread out than it is with women. You’re gonna have a lot of threes and sevens fours and eights, things like that. Yes, you’ll have some two versus eights.

There’s a lot of reason for that but I think they all boils down to evolution. Women get chased, they don’t chase.

Within reason, a relatively good looking woman can have most any man they want and usually go through a period where they take advantage of that. But after a while, they realize the rules of the game and understand most of the power is on their side so they start looking for other characteristics.

Here’s a great illustration of that. Go out for a fancy night on the town. Women will be dressed in all kinds of carefully mix and matched and different outfits. Almost all the men wear basically the same thing, dark suit jacket, lighter color in summer, maybe a tie maybe not,  dark pants. Men can have blue jeans, a polo, and a sport jacket and go almost anywhere in the entire world and fit in. Women can never do that.  

Now go to a big wedding. The women are all dressed up, the men all wear the exact same tux.

So character makes a difference. And character can manifest itself in a particular look that’s not necessarily handsome but, as the saying goes, he’s quite a character. Sense of humor is extremely high on that list. You have to be intelligent to have a really good sense of humor and that’s why women pick up on men who are really funny. And I’m not talking just drop an F bomb funny, I’m talking really funny, clever, maybe even a dark, dry sense of humor.

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 06/10/22 at 11:36:09:


Remember,
it is perfectly OK,
to be 'sidetracked'.

When Bot cannot answer the question:

"Can you explain why,
Sarah Palin, was at fault.
And Chuck Schumer, is not ?"