Eegore wrote on 05/31/22 at 20:53:02:

Please Refresh, when did you said:
the government has no ‘right’ to take your food’

"Please Refresh, when did you said:
the government has no ‘right’ to take your food’"

 What do you mean?  JoG claims I said the Government has the "right" to take your food.  They do not, I never said they did.


"Perhaps it is because;
I have never TOLD JOG, “…That is wrong...”
I have never told JOG ‘what to think.
I have never told JOG ‘how to think."

 When JoG claims 10 percent of children are dying from heart attacks and millions of kids aren't dead, he is wrong.  When he cites a court case that never existed, that is wrong.  When he claims hydroxychloroquine is a "proven cure" he is wrong, people that take it can still get Covid.  When he provides information he won't read and I read it and tell him what it says, he tells me I'm wrong.  He's sending me PM's telling me to "SHUT UP", I wouldn't even think to send anyone messages like that.

 I could care less what or how he thinks.  If anyone tells me that 2000 US Soldiers a day are being disabled, I'm not concerned how they think, I am concerned that that number is inaccurate.  My issue is the number, not JoG.


"It is Napoleonic LAW,
is is, ALSO, called, (Recently) Napoleonic Code."

 Napoleonic Code:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Napoleonic-Code

 "enacted on March 21, 1804"

 Recent?

"I did not say that"

 I never said to trust the CDC but you consistently claim I did.  So using that action, what we actually say, historically, is not pertinent to what can be claim has been said.

 As for this conversation I must have misunderstood your comment and was wrong:

"It's scary that you seem to have connections in government.
We are not under Napoleonic law. Our constitution is not designed to limit the people. It's limitation on government. How can anyone believe that a free citizen does Not have the Right to purchase From the grocery store?
Come on,, tell us exactly how the government has a right to take my store of food."

 I was in Białystok Poland and then finished setting up an away-team at Katterbach Kaserne Germany.  Nothing exciting, just some contract work.

You wouldn't keep stuff kinda to yourself, would you?
If I Ever find myself at Arbys, I'm having a coffee flavored malt.
They have one in Tyler, but it's been YEEERZ since wve been there.
What we do have is a place called Andy's. EauxMuGaawd,,, a strawberry malt? Yeah, a dude could suffer with Not doing what his heart wants..

Duude, tragic as that is, and Yes, that is heartbreaking levels of tragic, context is still important. How many of those Children are gang bangers? How many of them were armed and trying to kill the people who killed them? We simply can not allow ourselves to fall victim to the feelings that such tragedy would create. It's important that we understand the whole of it. Who Are these Children and where were they and what were they doing? Were they in any of those cities where guns are illegal? It's gonna take more than raw numbers to understand the whole of the situation.
It's Ten O'clock, do you know where your children are?

Okay.. I get that. So, what is the answer? Some people would agree that the perfect solution is
No guns.
Just as hardening school would send homicidal maniacs toward softer targets, and eliminating certain guns would send them toward different tools to accomplish their twisted goal, eliminating guns would send them toward a different method of murder.
Explosive devices are deadly, too. It's not, IMO, the equipment to murder. It's the twisted heart. A person bent on killing can use a red car and drive through innocent people. Our society has been goin downhill for decades. The Concept of Right and Wrong has been eroded. The sanctity of Life has been diminished. Actual consequences for bad behaviour has been seriously diminished in school. Any teaching that there is such a thing as Right and Wrong has been attacked. It seems like it has all become so subjective.. And standing For Good has come under attack.
And, Row,seriously, the Where were these Children? A 17 year old Child, with his buddies, engaged in a gang fight, is tragic, but it's not exactly the death of an Innocent Child.
Without All the facts, it feels like a statistical attempt to convince people of something that just isn't
As Advertised.
I'm not happy about what you shared, but I'm not about to allow myself to feel the kind of pain that I would if I knew those dead Children were Innocent Children.

It's without seriously important context.