I think nobody will show up,... it can't be safe if it's a gun free zone.  

There will be plenty of guns at Trumps speech. He will be surrounded by Armed Secret Service Personnel, just like any other ex POTUS.

Do you think it's unusual for guns to not be allowed in the audience at a speech given by an ex POTUS?

Sure, they trust armed Secret Service... they don't trust you.
Can't you see the irony?
They don't trust the "good guys" with guns.

I don't either.
Can you believe I have something in common with the NRA?  

justin_o_guy2 wrote on 05/28/22 at 09:58:15:

That's much like the adage There are no bad dogs only bad owners.
It makes no difference to the person getting bit.

..but it's hard for dog to kill 22 people.

Serowbot wrote on 05/28/22 at 10:36:32:


Wow, you REALLY Hate Guns.
(Get rid of the one you say you have yet ?)

St. Valentines Day massacre, and the Assignation attempt of the POTUS.
Was most likely the push that was used,
for the very first, (1934, N.A.F.)
      “Gun Ban’.

It disallowed a person, to buy over the counter, a fully Automatic firearm.
It registered every single one,
(Of the ones that people came forward with)
And created rules and regulations, AND FEEs,  for a civilian Citizen, to own a fully automatic firearm.

So today, if one wants one to own/use a fully automatic firearm,
they can.
Basically, you buy one, $10,000.00 to $20,000.00 for a plain jane one.
(a AR-16 sold to a police dept, is about $1,000.00)
You can NOT take possession of it,
until the Fed Gov ‘vet’s you.
That ‘vetting will take a year, many times more.
That ‘vetting’ will cost,
(In 1934 the N.A.F. set $200.00 as the fee,
in today's money that would be similar to $4,500.00)

Also it must be in YOUR possession/control at all times.
So you are at work, It MUST be locked up in a secure place/vault, where no one can get it.
If two Federal Agents came to the door,
Identified themselves, were verified,
and asked the Wife to get that gun out of the locked safe for them,
so they could just do a routine check,
(The Husband is the one that, legally owns it)
She would be IMMEDIATELY Arrested.

So the HONEST Citizen, needs to jump through all sorts of hoops,
Pay BIG money, wait a Year or more.
To own one of the 630,000 that are deemed to be ‘own-able’ by the A.T.F.

YET, Criminals, Non Citizens, Gang Bangers, Drug Lords,  Bank Robbers, (as long as they don’t drive a Red Car), Street Thugs killing other Street Thugs, for wearing the wrong color hat in the wrong place.
 (Well the last one, is just cleaning the pool, the gene pool that is)
Have the ability to buy one, out of a trunk !

Yep, totally restrict Freedom,
so Bot will feel Safer !

Oh wait,
Bot does have a means to protect himself,
he has said so.
     (unless he got rid of it,
  which he has not said he has)

Wonder if Bot had, but got rid of,
Smoke Detector, Fire Extinguisher, CO monitor, Spare tire/jack/wrench,  old rubber on a MC,  Seat-belts, Leather jacket/chaps/boots,  and all those other cumbersome objects?

If lefties have food and water put back, that sounds wrong. Being able to stay alive without a government agent making it possible just seems like something that should not be allowed.

Ohh! Lookie! Executive order to allow the government to come take your supplies!
Only Slightly unconstitutional. But who needs a written document to validate what everyone knows, in their heart?
Do YOU, as an individual, have a right to secure food,water,fuel,store it on YOUR property and prepare for hard times???
C'mon,, I Really wanna hear from you lefties here.

That challenge continues to go unaccepted.

Step up! Tell us how wrong it is.

Do YOU, as an individual, have a right to secure food,water,fuel,store it on YOUR property and prepare for hard times???

If not, you need to ditch your spare tire.

I'm preparing for that fishing trip. Looks like I'm gonna have plenty of crikkets