Eegore
Serious Thumper
Online
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 8393
|
"Without actual facts, we don't KNOW when he was relieved of being a felon."
But its ok to call "BS" or call someone a felon without facts.
He was not a felon when the shooting happened. That is a fact, that is why he was not charged with that crime. He was offered in 2013 a DPA which he completed and the felony was expunged.
Since Rittenhouse was not aware in any way and was not capable in any way of being previously aware of Grosskreutz's criminal history, they can not use this against Grosskreutz in court because it had zero influence on Rittenhouse's decision to fire his weapon.
So why get a felony conviction expunged if the criminal history couldn't be used in court anyway?
His charge in 2012 was expunged before, again, before the shooting happened.
Nobody on the planet can show that his felony conviction was expunged After the shooting. I wonder why that is. It's that important that not one law enforcement, legal expert, internet hacker, Judicial clerk, nobody can find that? I think its BS to say that this guy's testimony is so important that nobody can actually prove this to be true.
|