This trial has been somewhat overshadowed by Rittenhouse.
A case of "running while black".
Any comments?

I don't know much about it.

I might see what I think, dunno.

I'm still wondering what you think about Kyle.

All murder?
Some, and some self defense
All self defense?

Serowbot wrote on 11/18/21 at 08:56:52:

Funny how you fail to respond.

Here's a question
What will be the guiding factor for the jury?
Will their fear of the mob force them to declare Kyle guilty?
If they deliver a guilty verdict after seeing the pressure from the mob,can you celebrate, knowing the judgement was tainted? Ohh,yesss you can. Because you're a lefty and nothing matters except the agenda. Truth means Nothing.

Have you noticed that in both cases, Travis McMichael and Kyle Rittenhouse claim that they were in fear for their lives because the victim might take away their gun?
This would make carrying gun, justification for killing.

Kinda' catcha' 22 iish?... Huh


 If you leave out things like the law.  Imminent harm and capacity to engage have to be taken into account.  For instance I can't shoot someone in the back of the head 50 yards away from me because I am afraid they will take my gun away.  They have to actually be able to take my gun away.

First it was skateboards and plastic bags,... now it's skirts.
Are you sure sharpened flagpoles aren't weapons?

WebsterMark wrote on 11/18/21 at 09:47:28:

We shoot people for that, right?

I watched a little of the main defendant’s testimony and I read an article with the information I didn’t know about and I think the main defendant is sacrificing himself for his father who is ill. But one way or another, this guy is likely going to be convicted. I’m not sure if it’ll be murder or manslaughter or second-degree or what but this was not a self-defense case in the sense that the Rittenhouse case was. The defendants instigated the event.

On the other hand, this Aubrey guy seems like all the evidence points to him to being a burglar in the neighborhood knew it. Let’s assume for a minute the guys were right and he was robbing houses in the neighborhood under construction. Do you have the right to chase down someone surround them and confront them? I kind of think so. You’ve seen those videos of people pulling your cars up in front of stores and just robbing them blind knowing that the store attendants are ordered to stand down. If five or six men from the parking lot gathered around these people to stop them, who would object to that? And if during that confrontation a fight broke out, a weapon was displayed and the thief tried to grab it from the person and he was shot and killed, is that murder?

I'm not sure that Row quite understands that Trump was correct in the beginning when he agreed it was self defense for Kyle to shoot those people.
I have not seen anything from him that makes me think he gets it. I'm not sure how to proceed.