Tell you what, I will read your article, like I always do.
Then you read my information and we can have an informed discussion and compare. I see no reason not to look into a global increase in cardiac events if we can get information that shows it is true. I have been following cardiac event status in the US, but the information is still too diluted to be usable.
So what about this?
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm0620 Or would you rather not read anything I provide but somehow challenge it's validity as usual?
Here let me pull out something:
similar results when examining the time period corresponding to the dominance of the Delta variant (fig. S1). Specifically, among those with a positive PCR test on or after July 1, 2021, vaccination was protective against death, although with some differences by age and vaccine type.
For age <65 years, vaccine effectiveness against death (VE-D) was 81.7% (95% CI: 75.7% to 86.2%) for any vaccine; 73.0% (95% CI: 52.0% to 84.8%) for Janssen; 81.5% (95% CI: 70.7% to 88.4%) for Moderna; and 84.3% (95% CI: 76.3% to 89.7%) for Pfizer-BioNTech. For age ≥65 years, VE-D was 71.6% (95% CI: 68.6% to 74.2%) for any vaccine; 52.2% (95% CI: 37.2% to 63.6%) for Janssen; 75.5% (95% CI: 71.8% to 78.7%) for Moderna; and 70.1% (95% CI: 66.1% to 73.6%) for Pfizer-BioNTech. That's from the direct medical records of 780,225 Veteran medical records that can, and have been verified, because these documents actually exist.
So will go with speculative information or actual information first?
One issue is that the increase in ED activity is not skewed towards higher numbers of vaccinated. How are unvaccinated ending up in hospitals at the current percentage if it's the "Jab" causing the issue? If the jab is the catalyst why aren't more jabbed people per capita in the hospitals? I would expect to see that if the jab is the cause right?
Pages: 1
