I wonder how much impact these two comedy movies have on the overall view of the Republican party over time.

 For instance I've seen both of those movies and never even noticed the political party of the characters, but that's just me.

 How are you evaluating the sociological impact these films have?

 More important how do you define "associated with" in regards to a political party?  What are the parameters you would accept?

 Are these characters only fictional, or are interpretations of real humans allowed?

 What do you define as "Dumb or very bad" and is the character only to contain these traits?  For instance is "violent" exempt if the violence is not interpreted as "very bad"?   How is "very bad" differentiated from "bad"?


 An example is character Harley Quinn in the movie Birds of Prey voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 caucuses.  

 We need to establish if this makes her associated with the Republican Party, and if she is interpreted by the majority of viewers as being dumb, or very bad.

An example is character Harley Quinn in the movie Birds of Prey voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 caucuses

Never saw that, but voting for Sanders is politically acceptable to the entertainment culture so not sure what your point is.

 In the movie Dogma Jay and Silent bob are typically portrayed as being unintelligent.  To me, this qualifies them as "dumb".

 They indicate they are pro-choice.  This, to me, associates them with the Democratic party.  

 So we need to define if Jay and Silent Bob are dumb.

 If pro-choice associates them with the Democratic party.

 If pro-choice is acceptable to the Entertainment Culture.

 How impactful is the movie Dogma to the viewers that watched it?

 The most difficult part is your parameter that they be associated with the Democratic party "in the future" versus in current or past time, and "jokingly" so that creates severe limits to the content.  In Dogma there is comedy, but they lack being associated in the "future", it is present day for the film's timeframe.

How are you identifying characters as Conservative?
Are they identifying as Conservative or are you?
Do you ID them by behavior and see that as "dumb" or "bad"?
The prophecy seems self-fulfilling.

I didn’t say they were identified as conservative, quite the opposite. I was pointing out that at the end of the movie often times, the weirdest, most disliked people in the movie, if there’s a comedy bit at the end where they show their future, they’re almost always if not always associated with Republicans, Richard Nixon, George Bush, etc.

You are in so deep, you personify the saying can’t see the forest for the trees. You should stick to clever little sayings and cute emojis.

That’s a poor example. My example was in two movies I recently re-watched that had a flash forward at the end to portray where the characters ended up, in both cases the least desirable character was portrayed as being part of Republican administration White House. I have never ever seen that portrayed the other way. In the case of silent Bob and Jay, they make no reference to the fact that they are part of the Carter administration for example.

Are you going to argue or try to put up a defense that the entertainment culture is not left of center (or actually dramatically left of center)? Do you really believe you have a chance to make that case?

Your example is a poor one but let’s say I go ahead and give you a mercy point in your favor just for fun. You’re down 2-1. I can pull up 10 more on my side. Can you find 10 more on your side? The answer is no of course.

This would be like putting Serowbot in charge of a movie. As the Director, if the movie called for a flash forward scene at the end, do you think he would take at least desirable character and portray him as going on to be a central part of the Biden ministration? No, of course not.

Conservative ideology doesn’t fit in with Hollywood and it certainly doesn’t make it to the top where decisions like that are made. That’s obvious. You can’t argue against that. You can make the argument that it doesn’t matter which I would refute but you can’t argue that the infrastructure is in place for movies that attack political parties to attack the Republican Party 99% of the time.