Conservatism is humorless...

Serowbot wrote on 07/27/21 at 11:10:05:


Seriously, you guys absolutely ruined comedy. Late night shows are basically MSNBC repcaps. You guys can’t laugh at anything. I on the other hand can still tell any joke. Face it, when it comes to humor, you guys are fags.

"Honestly, I’m saving you from spending a lot of time proving water is wet."

 
 It's not my time you are saving.  There's people that do this for a living.

 Look we both know that those two movies aren't enough information to prove your opinion, but by locking us, "us" being all known humans besides Webstermark, to those exact parameters it has become an issue of only proving that those exact cinematic parameters are hard to find matches to.  Two movies out of hundreds of thousands is hardly a trend.

 This is no different than me challenging people to find a film that between 30 and 37 minutes a male is associated with the Democratic party by stealing political signs.  That challenge is useless because that one movie is not enough to prove Democrats can be idiots in film.  It means nothing without additional information, but we have to open that door to everyone.

 

"For fuxk’s sake Eegore, drop it. Water is wet. Hollywood’s default is left of center and a substantial portion dramatically left of center."

 I agree with that.  I have been agreeing this whole time with that.  I agree with you.

 I don't agree that two movies is enough evidence to show it.  So the challenge, to me, lacks enough substance to be pertinent.  However the question of how influential those two specific movies are is a valid question that could be examined.

 No more than I agree that one event gets it's own unique definition of "armed" because other events don't get enough news coverage or legal ramifications.

Serowbot wrote on 07/28/21 at 09:37:37:


Not at all. It’s a good one to go to when leftist get uptight.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdSu6amfYcA

You want me to post transcripts of the vile, racist crap antifa and BLM scream in directly in the face of black officers?…..

What’s the point of your post? Is this a challenge to see who can post the vilest language?

Again,
you completely, (or deliberately)
miss the point.

Quote:


That is comparison to a one time event,
where people believe a election was crooked.
vs a event that lasted two years,
destroyed and stole billions of dollars of stuff,
all because a police officer applied his training and subdued a drug addled Felon with a rap sheet as long as your arm.

The POINT is.
The vast majority of the MEDIA,
have  made a MOUNTAIN out of a molehill,
        over one.
And ignored, brushed off, forgot about,
       the other.

The POINT is.
One event is treated with kid gloves,
and the other is gloves off.

The POINT is.
Those I am TOLD to hate,
     the hammer comes down.
Those I am TOLD to love,
     can do no wrong.

Just as all the recent STEELING in Calf.
Where is it reported on all the Nat, TV/big Media, ‘programs’?
Why is it not 24/7 ?
Why is it ‘hid’, one one has to look for it ?

https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/05/14/shoplifting-california-prop-47-redu
ced-penalties/
https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2020/11/03/california-legalizes-shoplifting-predict
able-results-n351372
https://needtoknow.news/2019/09/california-law-allows-grab-and-dash-theft-rings-
to-steal-950-in-merchandise-before-facing-felony-charges/
https://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2020/03/no-penalty-for-shoplifting-under-950...
https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-in-California-you-can-steal-anything-yo...

“…the result is essentially zero punishment for shoplifting offenses, and the criminals know it. If there is no punishment for a particular crime, does that mean you can commit it? …”

“… Anyway, since petty theft with priors is no longer on the books, as long as the suspect steals no more than $950 worth of stuff, they will be issued a ticket to appear in court on a misdemeanor charge. If convicted, the judge is unable to sentence them to additional jail time for prior offenses, no matter how many priors they may have, including serious theft related crimes. The conviction will appear on their record, but they won’t do a single day in jail since there is no place to put them and they are no longer eligible for prison. And the suspects know this.  …”


Golly Gee Wally,
why dosen’t this, ‘news’ trump
the ferrel donkey getting puled from a flooded stream ?      

Simple, the UL, FDS, Socialist mass  media,
        is  doing what it is TOLD to do,
by the UL DFI FDS Pocket Stuffing Democrat’s.


And yet again,
The POINT is,
“… say one thing,  do another thing …”
(as the current POTUS frequently does)

"The POINT is.
The vast majority of the MEDIA,
have  made a MOUNTAIN out of a molehill,
       over one.
And ignored, brushed off, forgot about,
      the other."


 And the solution is to keep bringing up how many criminals committed crimes.  Those guys committed crimes.  Those other guys committed more crimes!

 The media isn't fair!  

 Yeah we all know that.  Why would anyone think "the media" is fair?  If you choose to watch a media source and support it just deal with the information you choose to consume.

 What I am saying is the pattern here is to try to compare which criminals are more criminal and somehow try to convince people that their political affiliation is important.