"The CDC is a political scientific organization."

 I agree.  I have said that multiple times.

 Also when I post the following it is predictably ignored:

This section on the death certificate is for reporting the sequence of conditions that led directly to death. The immediate cause of death, which is the disease or condition that directly preceded death and is not necessarily the underlying cause of death (UCOD), should be reported on line A."

"The conditions that led to the immediate cause of death should be reported in a logical sequence in terms of time and etiology below it."


 Then provide actual death certificate breakdowns, then do the math, then provide thousands of data points for review. But it's wrong and some people don't even have to look to know.  

 However it is expected I look at their references.

Once again, Eegore for the win!!

Quote:


So you are asking me, to post information that you are fundamentally more familiar with.
As a answer to the request to post answers, to the below questions.
Again, in a subject, you are fundamentally more FAMILIAR WITH.

Cancer retaliated deaths in the last 1-1/2 years.
Heart retaliated  deaths in the last 1-1/2 years.
Diabetic retaliated deaths in the last 1-1/2 years.
Old Age retaliated deaths in the last 1-1/2 years.
Or any other serious ailment retaliated deaths in the last 1-1/2 years

"So you are asking me, to post information that you are fundamentally more familiar with.
As a answer to the request to post answers, to the below questions.
Again, in a subject, you are fundamentally more FAMILIAR WITH."


 I am saying that when you state:

After all,  ALL those people that died in a Car Crash, who tested Positive, were marked of DYING of C-19.

 This is wrong.  Unless of course you have access to actual death certificates that actually say this, then please let me look through them.  FACTS please, since you request that from me.

 No amount of asking other questions makes your statement true.  Yet this untrue statement is a critical part of your overall post.  Of course myself being fundamentally more FAMILIAR WITH a topic has historically not meant anything even with empirical evidence, numbering in the thousands in this case, being presented.  Historically you have told me to go look up for myself anything I want to have information on, (because another forum member told you that), and now all the sudden it's ok to keep asking me to look things up for you.

 If my evidence that All those Car Crashes were listed as dying "of" C-19 is wrong, why wouldn't all the other data sets I provide also be wrong?  For months I have provided information that people are classified as "With" C-19 and "From" C-19 and as this thread shows - its ignored.  As such I expect if my information on Cancer Mortality, Cardiac Mortality, Diabetic Mortality, Natural Cause mortality, and "any other serious complainant retaliated" whatever that is supposed to mean, will also be wrong if it does not meet the pre-decided outcome.

 You are asking for millions of data sets, and you won't even acknowledge the one I keep providing.  So yeah if anyone ignores FACTS they can just sit there and claim, without evidence, that "Old Age" deaths are down because "All" old age people were classified as C-19.  Which would still be untrue, because none of these claims changes that the NCHS does not implement U07.2 for mortality statistics.

 Now is it plausible that the lowered "Seasonal flu" counts are due to C-19 classification/counting methods?  Yes.  But not in the same way that this false car crashes are "all" being documented as dying "from" C-19 nonsense.

T And T Garage wrote on 05/21/21 at 07:58:51:


Fauci doesn’t think so.