@Rockn, what else would you expect, I mean he made a bet that he'd vacate the forum biden became president and he used the same other side excuse as well, in this case he refers to me as 'the other side' and that he is not going to honour his bet because he "knows" that I wouldn't have if I had lost. That's enough to tell you that this will always be his argument over anything. What is hilarious, is that not only does he welch on his bet, but at the time, he insisted he wouldn't welch on his bet because, (ahem) wait for it... because he's a better person than me. So he tries to get kudos then he slinks away for a couple of months and comes back with exactly the same b.s. You have to admire his chutzpah.

Rockn wrote on 05/17/21 at 07:39:58:

What part of the above post of mine exactly has been "disproven". As soon as you tell me I'll look up the written record. To prove that it has not been 'disproven'.


Do tell, Mark.

@TT,

I mean how perfect is this, we have WM saying that what he said he did not say and that has 'been disproven'. lol.

FFS, it's written down, on this very forum, I can prove that easily enough, which I will do when WM explains how it has been 'disproven'.

"Ya mean C-19 was responsible for the massive earthquake in Haiti  ?"

 Why would you think that?  I was very obviously comparing response in the US to outcomes I have witnessed elsewhere.  Nothing about my post indicated C-19 causes earthquakes and nobody is interpreting it that way but you.  I also do not think C-19 caused missile strikes that destroyed buildings all over Syria, but if I make a comparison to infrastructure stability in the US during C-19 am I saying C-19 "caused" missile strikes?



Did not know C-19 was in Haiti, 10 years before it, 'affected' the rest of the world !

 It wasn't.  How did you come to the conclusion that I was referring to C-19 in 2010?  I never claimed I was working mass grave hydrology for C-19 in 2010, or any other time.  I was indicating I have seen mass graves, and we do not want that in the US.

 My point is ANTIFA protests and damage in the US is not exactly the worst I have seen.  But it has disproportionally larger impact on non-participants.

"Those false allegations have already been dealt with."


 It's obviously going to make it more clear if you just state what those allegations are and what part(s) are false.  

 I for one could care less who logs in and who doesn't but it seems to me that you did say you would leave, you left, then just started reposting.  I might have missed something but I recall this:

"okay, that’s a bit much but point is I’m pushing away from the table and heading out the door today."

"Few more posts throughout the day and then like Trump I’m gone. And just like Trump, you guys will miss me."


 Of course Eau will comment on this, especially since you stated he would find a way to keep posting even if Trump was re-elected.  

 So I am guessing you just mean the part where you claimed you were "better" or whatever than Eau.  It's pretty clear, to me, what you meant when you posted this:


"For the last time, and try to pay attention, when there is no doubt who will take the oath, if it’s Uncle Joe, I’ll pay the $200 bet Eegore agreed to as a way to give the child TT some cover, and I’ll leave.

If Good finds a way to triumph over Evil, I expect you to leave."


 If I posted this I would definitely expect Eau, or others to be hassling me about posting again.  It's just what it is, at the end of the day it's a non-issue in my opinion.  I mean technically nobody said for how long right?

WebsterMark wrote on 05/18/21 at 09:10:01:


The irony in this thread is getting too deep.