This is good to see.


 My concern is Ramsland has done this before with very inaccurate results.  Remember that Michigan lawsuit Trump abandoned?  Ramsland's data was in that.

 He also very obviously inflated numbers and I imagine he hoped nobody would notice he took Minnesota data and applied it to Michigan, or he can't tell MN from MI.  In either case he was still wrong on the numbers, I mean 782% overvote in North Muskegon?  That's not hard to verify.
 
 His affidavit is here:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.283580/gov.uscourts.gan...


 I only have two people that can look this over with me now so it might take a while to get through it all.
 
 
 

 I'm not a fan of letting someone else read documents for me and tell me what they mean.

 Ok it took less than an hour to identify major flaws in this report.  I will go through them step by step if anyone wants but bottom line is this report is very poor.

 One example is the "adjudication software" they claim is used in Antrim county.  Those machines don't use it.  They use Dominion Image Cast 5 Central (ICC) high-speed scanners, not Image Cast Precinct (ICP) tabulators.

Eegore wrote on 12/15/20 at 07:26:50:

 Ok it took less than an hour to identify major flaws in this report.  I will go through them step by step if anyone wants but bottom line is this report is very poor. . .

      I did not read that particular report.
   So glad you told me,
what was in it !
      And what it means.