eau de sauvage
|
And you believe that supports your position..
Er, I'm not the one taking a 'position', unless you consider accepting the unanimous verdicts of State and Federal courts and appellate courts and State and Federal Supreme courts all ruling the same way, and declaring 'no presented fraud and no valid legal cases and dismissing hearsay, as "a position".
In fact you are the one buying into the conspiracy theories about stolen election. And conspiracy it is because it would have to involve Republican Judges, and Legislatures colluding with some unnamed Democrat operatives as well as the DoJ and FBI. Which is a remarkable position to take.
And you believe that supports your position..
Not at all, I believe that it in fact points to the craziness of the 'rigged election' rhetoric.
The difference between you and the GOP Retrumplicans, is that they know this is all bs, but they are forced to play Trump's game, and they think there's safety in numbers. However you seem to believe it's real. And if that is the case, then I'm not sure what you hope to achieve by going along with it on these boards.
No sane person whatever their politics thinks this election was rigged judging by the court results. And if you believe the Trump propaganda then you're in the same position as a Jehova's Witness trying to convince people to listen to them.
Your faith in this is like a religious belief and if that is your belief then all you can do is state it, which you have, there's nothing more to say. I understand after seeing your responses that I may as well try and convince a JW to abandon their beliefs, it's the same thing.
I don't understand how you can dismiss the results of 60 cases being thrown out. How can you carry on with your blind belief in the face of this much evidence contrary to what you think. I get it that you're free to think what you want but if you cannot accept republican appointed judges' decisions and reasoning, then who do you trust?
It's like creationists trying to get creation "science" taught in the classroom. Sure it can be taught in religious studies but not in a science class. If scientists say it's not science then it's not science. Who do you ask to check if it's science or not? Plumbers? Popular vote?
Same with this, the "evidence" has been presented to the specialists, meaning the courts, and they've unanimously thrown it out. If you can't accept that, then what?
Have you seen Barr's asslicking 'resignation' letter to Trump? Yet even he said there's no 'there' there.
|