This is the information I have used to develop my opinions on the election fraud suspicions in PA. It's all here in black and white, no influence by newscasters, Youtubers etc. no additional drama or excuses.
Feel free to look over them and let me know your opinion.
Pennsylvania:
Donald J Trump for President, Inc v. Kathy Boockvar and County Boards of ElectionsComplaint:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7739/file-10379.pdf?cb=935544Response:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7739/file-10429.pdf?cb=9ef2c1Order:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7739/file-10440.pdf?cb=aa5ec4 I feel the Court was correct in their order of segregation.
1094 CD 2020Filing:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7731/file-10384.pdf?cb=efaf27Appeal:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7731/file-10384.pdf?cb=efaf27I feel the section in the appeal citing 23 A.3d 528 (Pa. 2011) is the most compelling.
Ruling:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7742/file-10581.pdf?cb=1c606bPA Supreme Court Dissents:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7742/file-10582.pdf?cb=caa214http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7742/file-10580.pdf?cb=aa3c11 Pending case Nos. 201100874-201100878:http://www.pacourts.us/news-and-statistics/cases-of-public-interest/election-... This one I feel should have been thrown out, this is quite a stretch:
"The Democratic National Committee is an intervenor-defendant in Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., et al. v. Philadelphia Cnty. Bd. of Elections, Nos. 1136, 1137, 1138, 1139, and 1140 CD 2020 (Pa.Commw. Ct.). In that case, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., and Elizabeth J. Elkin (collectively the “Campaign”) filed five appeals asking the Court of Common Pleas to invalidate 8,329 absentee and mail-in ballots submitted by Philadelphia County electors solely because they arrived in outer envelopes that lacked a handwritten name, address, date, or some combination thereof."
Typed envelopes, which I use, would have been disqualified, even though there is no instruction's that there
must be a hand-written envelope.
Montgomery:Filing:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7772/file-10446.pdf?cb=6058b1Response:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7772/file-10461.pdf?cb=2e9facRuling:
http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7772/file-10461.pdf?cb=2e9fac I don't think the 592 ballots in question were inaccurately counted.
Pending - Donald J. Trump for President v. Bucks County Board of Electionshttp://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7759/file-10431.pdf?cb=88b76f I am still looking into this one. So far I agree that the complaints are exclusively engaged in procedural issue and not validation. As in the question if a vote has a mark, a hand-written portion, etc. and not if the vote was cast by a legal-to-vote human.
That's a big issue. Invalidating votes because they are not cast legally is different than invalidating because of a mark on the envelope. They are essentially saying the vote could be real, but disregard it based off of suspicion of bad procedure alone.