Eegore wrote on 10/29/20 at 10:55:25:


Liers...
... but  that was rhetorical, right?...

Eegore wrote on 10/29/20 at 10:55:25:


I don’t know if anyone said they didn’t make copies. All they said was the originals had been removed from the package.

The entire point of the story is not the story but the announcement. That's why it has broken right on election time. They know there's no substance all they want is a suggestion of a hint of something. Unfortunately only in the Trump Cinematic Universe does anyone understand the secret code words and meanings. That's why Guiliani is so angry at Fox, it's why Trump is so angry at Lindsey Graham and Billy Barr. All Trump and his enablers want is a headline that lasts until Nov 3rd.

All this suspicious coming from people who hung a Supreme Court nomination on the “recovered memories” of a women thrown into therapy when she saw a new door installed in her house. Not only was there no evidence to back her story, but in fact the evidence that was available directly contradicted her story. Regard, you and the media went 24/7 full bore, tore into high school yearbooks, tracked down paper boys in the neighborhood in an attempt to find anything. Sew, you were so taken in, you believed this kid organized mass rape parties all summer long. You probably bought but the “I believe her” tee shirt.

But actual emails sent to someone, screen prints of text messages and recordings of phone calls are all fabricated??? You guys are totally messed in the head, TDS is eating your brain cells. Biden just says “That’s been dismissed, no one believes that malarkey” and you deep, serious thinkers who applauded dredging the bottom of the barrel looking for any potential witness , now all you can say is, “Well, that settles it. Joe said it never happened so that’s the end of it”

There’s an FBI investigation opened in 2019 against Hunter Biden and his “associates”. Let’s see how anxious you are to hear from witnesses now.

Oh, and if Biden wins, all of a sudden you won’t object at all to a sitting President calling off an FBI investigation as the head of the justice department.

Eegore wrote on 10/29/20 at 16:43:50:


That’s ridiculous. Hundreds of pages? Recordings of phone calls? Are you saying this guy Tony hired a actors to impersonate Hunter’s voice and that of his partners? And the guy turned everything over to the FBI. Do you think an ex naval officer who had a successful international business is going to fabricate all of this and then turn it over to the FBI to be scrutinized? Does that even make sense to you?

Fabrications are short documents like Dan Rather‘s infamous note about George Bush. Not hundreds of pages, screenshots of text messages, recordings of phone calls, and of course three full cell phones turned over to the FBI. If this is a fabrication, it’s the largest, most detailed fabrication of all time.

"That’s ridiculous. Hundreds of pages? Recordings of phone calls? Are you saying this guy Tony hired a actors to impersonate Hunter’s voice and that of his partners? And the guy turned everything over to the FBI. Do you think an ex naval officer who had a successful international business is going to fabricate all of this and then turn it over to the FBI to be scrutinized? Does that even make sense to you?"

 No, I never said anything like that at all.  I very specifically said:

"I agree to a point that the measure of fabrication here is too much to just say it was all made up."

 To clarify I agree, as in the opposite of disagree, I agree with you that it's very unlikely that all of this was fabricated.  I do not however think that all of it is completely truthful since some, not all, just some, as in portions exclusive to their specific content and not all content as a whole, just parts, like the email images, are presented in the exact format one would use if they do not want discovery into their detailed, verifiable information.  

 But only those parts, not all.  As in sections, pieces or separate entities of information presented.  Not every part, the whole thing, or 100%.  Just parts, not all.

WebsterMark wrote on 10/29/20 at 15:34:28:


As follow up to this, most of you leftist repeated The NY Times story and figures on Trump’s taxes as absolute truth, but the truth is the Times listed the source as “Anonymous” so you have no idea who it was. But not only do you not believe this guy Tony Bobulinski, a former Naval officer who contributed only to Democrats, you refused to even review the info. And you dismiss the former Naval Officer as being a partner in a Russian disinformation plot.