Eegore wrote on 10/09/20 at 07:32:33:
... Would you refuse this treatment if it was shown to be effective even though it's development has some abortion based cell structure?
Harris was:
“…was raised on Hinduism and Christianity …”Now:
“...Harris now considers herself a Black Baptist…." “… Hinduism is therefore generally opposed to abortion except where it is necessary to save the mother's life….”
“…You don't have to be Christian to oppose abortion, but if you're Christian, you should oppose abortion…”“...the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A. opposes abortion "as a means of avoiding responsibility for conception, as a primary means of birth control, and without regard for the far-reaching consequences of the act …"
“… Harris has cosponsored the most aggressively pro-abortion piece of federal legislation ever introduced…”
“...She is without question the most radically pro-abortion candidate to run for president or vice president in the history of our country…”
So the question needs to asked of Harris:
Would you refuse Abortion, because of simple convenience, because your religion/s, that you say you believe in, say you should ? And if 'No",
is that hypocritical?
Next:
"...HEK 293T is not by today's standards typically considered aborted fetal tissue because it has replicated itself for decades..."So, something that was used 20 + years ago,
is now, NOT, using the same source.
Just the knowledge.
According to you, Should be wrong ?
Gosh, I can think of Hundreds of Thousands of things,
which were accepted at one time in the past,
which today, that use/gathering, is not accepted.
Yet the knowledge, of using that thing,
which NO LONGER, requires today's,
non accepted harvesting.
"...I See, as he picked up his hammer and Saw..."Question, Why is;
2 cells dividing in a Human Body,
Not considered 'Life'.
Yet one cell, which is dead,
(as we know it),which at one time, possibility, contained,
a biological substance,
(as we know it).Is considered by the SAME people,
as 'LIFE" ?