This needs to be compared against all of Fauci's emails.

 The article brings up a point but provides speculative assessment over facts.  

 I for one would never say I love someone in professional email, but I have received emails like that from my superiors, and associates some of which are ranking military.  I can specifically remember the first time I received an email with the words "We love you" and it came from a US ARMY Colonel.  Turns out he used the word freely, which was found out by comparing how he speaks to others, not how other's guess about how he speaks.

 I'd like to see a breakdown of Fauci's emails on related topics to see if this was a one-time thing.

 Yeah really.

 2 emails out of how many do you estimate?  I'd think in the past decade there would be thousands.

 The article asks:

"Would you ever consider writing a letter to your employer, or the family of your employer, declaring your undying love and devotion toward them?"


 First I wouldn't go as far as "undying love" or even pull up the word devotion in this type of email, but that's me looking at it like a normal email and not trying to vilify anyone.

 Obviously he does not harbor animosity towards the recipient of the email.  Does this email mean he is going to undermine his career?  Maybe, but I personally would want more information than these old emails.

 I would take the entirety of know emails, cut them by personal statement an search those for similar quotes.  A large chunk would most-likely be strictly work-related, another chunk could possibly have nothing at all to do with work, like an email reminding his wife to call the mechanic.

 One the email's were examined for frequency of statements, if any others exist, then we can answer the articles question more accurately.  At this point it is asking if I would do what Fauci did, and the answer of course is no.

 I think with any human we would take the entirety of their statements over a selected portion to decide how often they use certain words.

 I guess it depends on what your definition of "political" is.

 I wouldn't consider those two emails to be "political" to the point of saying the author, no matter who it is, is being political.  He's obviously impressed with the speech, but is it because of the person or the content?  I'd have to guess on that.

 Why are people still bringing Hillary into things anyway?  I heard a lot of that in Houston, but nobody had an answer beyond things that happened 6 or more years ago.  Is she doing anything today?

Calling Fauci a Doctor is like calling an african dictator a doctor because the state run university has conferred an honorary doctorate on him - He's a paper pusher, grant approver and govt employee in that position since 1982 when he graduated from medical school.
That way, I am a civil engineer and I graduated in 1991 - you really dont want to drive over a bridge I've built.
This is why the swamp must be drained. These fools care too much about their own hide to do anything useful. He doesn't need to have loyality to anything but the american people who employ him - Killary definitely does not qualify except in that 1/350,000,000 aspect. And Trump also gets that same share as a person - however as established, the global elite are out to get us, Trump is just in their way - I'm inclined to count trump in for a lot of the rest of the 350 million.

Cool.
Srinath.