Turnining away from anything because of the Potential for Misuse is , IMO, a gutless way of making decisions,
EVERYHTING can be misused, And using that
Ohh, But what IF someone Did This?
as an excuse to NOT do something that has merit, is not just gutless,, its also smacks of  what I like to call
Prior Restraint,,

Lets dont train,, because someone might learn something and use it inappropriately,,
Well,, TRaining might just save some good guys from a serious injury or death, too,,
AND,, Now heres the kikker,,

WE have Laws to punish those who do the wrong thing,,
Maybe enforce those laws instead of inhibit others,,
So,, Me to you?

Go toss your candy glass,, and have fun,,

Are you saying youre concerned that the training could be teaching
Good Guys
to do what they really should not be doing?

It wasn't that long ago we as a nation were prepared to nuke the Communists back to the stone age.
Now they're running amok in our cities saying kill the police.

My training program is simple. Shoot 1st ask questions later.
These are NOT peaceful protesters they are violent Communists that we spent 50 years fighting against. And they want to KILL cops.

So what's the discussion about? Shoot em on sight.

They've already expressed their intent to kill cops.
At this point it's a simple matter of self defense on the cops part.

The threat is established you can't reasonably expect them to handle the jackasses with kid gloves now

None of it is about actual justice anymore. Once the antifa terrorists got involved it became purely political. And now it's out of control and the innocent bystanders getting burned out of their homes and having their lives destroyed deserve justice too now. And we're supposed to be keeping them safe.

It's a mob of destructive and deadly terrorists that are politically motivated and who loudly call for the murder of police officers.
This delusion about peaceful protesters has been gone awhile now. The media is beating a dead horse.
In the real world there are consequences. If you attack someone youve threatened to kill then that person has the right to defend themselves.
It's a bad idea. People know better. Trying to juxtapose it as something it isn't doesn't change the facts.

And if it's just dumb college kids how did they get that dumb? They're in college for crying out loud.
They aren't that dumb that they don't understand the consequences of their actions. They know what they're doing. But more than likely they don't know the real reason they have been indoctrinated into doing it.
They've been brainwashed into believing it's a good cause but really. They are pawns in a much bigger game and don't have a clue.

Let me get this straight, you're coming down to this festering sh!thole of a right wing racist scumbag troll forum to inquire about an 'ethics' issue?

ROFL

"So why has one, really bad, football player caused such a stew.
And has received millions in compensation for branding ?"

 Who's rights did he violate?

 When a football player is trained in football camp that he is not violating people's Constitutional rights and he actually is, or the football camp otherwise develops methods of training designed specifically to maim or kill other players, staff or audience members at a game it will relate to my topic.

 If I am called in to teach football players how to crush the trachea of other players under the facemask and develop a consistent evaluation tool based off of how many players they kill, I think that it might be a bit unethical for me to engage in that contract.