"And the, 'proof', that a large number BELIEVE, that travel was restricted.
Would be the SAME proof you used to say:"


 Yeah.  I made it up, its complete nonsense with no factual evidence of any kind. Just garbage I made up, that means nothing. 

 So again:

 Do you know anyone that thought they could not travel specifically within the US?  

 Did they attempt to see if they could?

"Eegore finally got the original post !"

 Except you say I didn't when I said it the first time:


Eegore: " A major hotel chain, a business sustained on travel, is helping keep people at home."  

MNSpring:  No, it is a Hotel/Ad Agency, using what they believe the shepole, (UL FDS Snowflake Socialists), believe.
In saying:  “the open road is open   again"


 Choice Hotels, a business sustained on travel is using biased or misleading information to further enforce FALSE ideas that sheepish people WILL stay home, or could not travel.


 Not.  Travel.

 A business sustained on travel, is helping enforce the idea that people could not travel.  Great idea.



 Even though you won't answer, I will ask again:

 Do you know anyone that thought they could not travel specifically within the US?  

 Did they attempt to see if they could?
 

Choice Hotels, a business sustained on travel is using biased or misleading information to further enforce FALSE ideas that sheepish people WILL stay home, or could not travel.

Actually,, what they ARE saying Is,,
If you thought you culdnt

NOW Ya Can,,

But,, you can pretend its saying Stay Hoome

"Actually,, what they ARE saying Is,,
If you thought you culdnt

NOW Ya Can,,

But,, you can pretend its saying Stay Hoome"


 I don't think they are saying either one of those.  I am stating how I interpreted what MnSpring posted.  

 That a hotel chain, a business dependent on travel is choosing to market to a small percentage of extremely ignorant people that obviously don't even try to ask, look, assess or in any way see if they can travel.

 Instead of a marketing campaign focused on the larger group that knows what is actually going on.

"That group is the very large group, who Believed, they could Not travel, unless they had 'papers' that said they were, 'essential'.
And then only to/from, that, 'essential, work."


 Do you know anyone that thought they could not travel specifically within the US?  

 Did they attempt to see if they could?

 Or can you explain how I can "look up" who you know personally and find out?

"I
TOLD
You

I Personally KNow a 21 YO guy who TOLD me he was ONLY going to work and Home,, because of what the MAYOR said he wanted,, He Felt like it was essential to DO as he was told.."


 I got that, which is why I didn't ask you again.

 Its obvious not as many people were out.  But how many did not leave town because they heard a Mayor say interstate travel was forbidden?

 The question is how many people thought they were not allowed to travel in the US.  As in go to the next town, or anywhere that would cause one to use a hotel.  Not to work, not to the grocery store, but away from their primary residence and to a location that would have cause for the use of a hotel.

 As I read the original post, Choice Hotels developed a marketing campaign designed to mislead people into thinking they could not travel.  Not a good move for a company based on travel.

 
 

"What happens when someone is headed on a Long trip, to a place that doesnt require a quarantine, passing thru places that do,, all ya can do is check in, buy room service, check out, ht the road and While youre On the Road,, Your destination Enacts a quarantine,, Not all that conducive to travel, izzit?"


 No.  

 I am referring to Choice Hotels developing a marketing campaign targeting a small percentage of their consumer base instead of the larger group.

 As in why are they spending the time intentionally misleading people who might hear what a Mayor says the wrong way instead of having a marketing campaign that is just designed to capitalize on the average consumer who didn't hear that one Mayor say that one thing about travel, that one time that was wrong?  

 Better to focus on the people that heard that Mayor give incorrect information, not anyone else I guess.

"And for you idiots who listened to everything that said
DONT TRAVEL
STAY HOME
Well,, we are here for you, TOO.."


 Right.  But in your scenario the "idiots who listened to everything" are just included in a normal ad campaign.

 But MnSpring, when stating the ad is "PROPAGANDA" is by definition saying the ad is designed to mislead.  So its not just an ad that "includes" the idiots, it is targeted for them specifically.


 Why did Choice Hotels first decide to choose propaganda over a normal inclusive ad campaign?

 Why did they choose the smallest group to intentionally mislead?  Not include, but target?

 Who sat in a board room and said they should propagandize what could just be a normal ad campaign that also helps morons understand they can leave town?