"I've shown what people see."

 Show me anyone that has seen the words "Riots are ok" from any organization, Governor, or any elected official of a kind.  That's your claim, that its been said that "riots" are being approved.

 Or keep making that part up.  You are proving your point based off a lie and thus lose any credibility after that.

 This is just like the CDC "lies" that are actually the lies of other people reporting on something the CDC told the truth about.  So the organization that accepted the Truth, and didn't complain ended up with a more accurate dual reporting system.  I wonder what State ended up doing that.  I wonder what group was flown to DC to show it.  

 Was it the group that made up lies or exaggerated facts to justify their complaints?

 Was it the group that complained to "the news"?

 Or was it the group that accepted facts, stopped claiming the CDC is "lying" (when they actually told the truth), challenged them, and developed an alternative?


 The fact that you are claiming anyone said "Riots are approved" stops anyone from taking you seriously.  That statement is simply a lie.

 There is hypocritical behavior, but not in the way you are claiming.  You are very obviously exaggerating to skew information towards your compliant, but it's not fooling anyone.

 So since I don't agree that "riots" are "approved" you call me stupid, instead of having an adult conversation about it.

Eegore wrote on 06/10/20 at 07:47:16:

 Show me one State Order indicating protests are OK but other assemblies are not.   

So a Candy store opening, 250+ people belly to Azzhole, (no, "written', order), is not OK also ?

Yet that is now ALLOWED, (in MN), by lack of doing something about it.

While Schools/Graduations/Weddings/Funerals/Reunions/etc/etc/etc ...
HAVE, a 'written' order. . .

Youre so disengenuous.
They Allow
Protests
and thats a given
and Which Protests Arent Riots? Who is stopping the riots?
What the everluvvin FUKK is goin on in Seattle?