justin_o_guy2 wrote on 06/09/20 at 16:30:03:



WHO Doctor says "Data suggests that asymptomatic people infected with WuFlu really don't  infect the people they come in contact with very often.

WHO management who have been promoting "lock yerself in the house, wear a mask,stop the spread, flatten the curve,everfookin body you pass on the street is gonna kill yer a*s if they breath on you!!" narrative promptly sh*t their pants, take that doctor out back and give her a stern talking to.

Doctor returns looking contrite and a little disheveled. Says "What I said a little while ago wasn't really  what you heard me say a little while ago.'

Experts.

Cui bono.

 Well if we want to take statements made by different people, organizations, and mobs and pretend that one organization said all that, or that they even agree amongst themselves, then sure this makes sense.

 WHO and CDC are two different entities that actually haven't agreed on a lot of the models, and State orders.  Not one of them have said anything close to "Well, NOW its time to take to the Streets!"


 As I said before this will just be a circular logic:  

 Mortality rates are low because the virus wasn't that bad.  No mortality rates are low because social distancing worked.  Nope, the virus was Bullshit, that's why deaths aren't in the millions.  Nope, people engaged in social distancing that's why deaths weren't in the millions.

 Lets ignore that nobody said deaths would be in the millions and just claim that your belief was why this wasn't as bad as nobody at all ever said it was going to be anyway.

"Just like you wanted to pretend
The very same jobs had to come back
To say
The jobs came back."

 I never said that, and I told you that, but you will ignore it so you can keep bringing it up.  I clarified specifically how the numbers I used work, but you wont look at them so you can keep incorrectly claiming I said something I:

Did.
Not.
Say.

 
"But it's obvious that depending on reason
Restricting people is done differently."

 Show me one State Order indicating protests are OK but other assemblies are not.  Just one that is saying any of these gatherings are "Good", acceptable, endorsed, allowed, cool, ok, or in any capacity conducive to social distancing and are encouraged.

 We can pretend the Lefty cities somehow are issuing State social distancing orders so we can falsely claim they are not ok with church but are ok with protests.  Lefty cities didn't issue Stay at Home orders, the State did.  But we will ignore that part.

 So again lets clump together two different organizations saying two different things and pretend they are the same group giving conflicting information.

Aaaand a Guvnah,, Businesses , meeh,, gotta go slow,, But riots? Hey,, go for it!

New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy indicated Monday that he has no plans to enforce social distancing rules on large groups gathering for anti-racism protests even as non-essential businesses are allowed to reopen only in phases and other large groups are prohibited.

“I can’t imagine what it would look like if we said to people, ‘Actually, you have to stay in. You have to ignore systemic racism — I’m sorry, just ignore it. Stay in,’” the governor said during his daily coronavirus briefing. I can’t imagine what that looks like as it relates to public safety.”


The governor attended protests in Hillside and Westfield, two of the more than 130 protests across New Jersey over the weekend in response to the death of George Floyd, a black man who died in police custody in Minneapolis after a white police officer knelt on his neck for close to nine minutes, persisting even after Floyd lost consciousness.

New Jersey has been hit harder by the coronavirus than any state except neighboring New York, with more than 12,200 deaths from the infection since early March.

Murphy last month extended his state’s stay at home order, which has been in place since March 21, limiting gatherings to a maximum of 25 people and enforced the temporary shutdown of non-essential businesses. Dozens of businesses and residents have been charged with violating the stay at home order.

9
The governor acknowledged the risks the large protests pose to controlling the spread of the virus and encouraged those who participated to get tested for coronavirus, but noted that many protesters have worn face masks during the demonstrations.

“We cannot let what happened across New Jersey this weekend be undone by an outbreak,” Murphy said. “What all these numbers tell us is that the spread of Covid-19 continues to slow and that is again why I encourage everyone who took part in a march or a peaceful protest this weekend to get tested.”

Send a tip to the news team at NR.

NOW WATCH: 'Distancing and Masks Are Key to Cut Risk of COVID-19'

cost of not doing something is a lot greater.”...

So.
As long as the perpetually butthurt are placated, it's okay,
But
The cost of not going to work for millions..
Well.. social justice,,

Thanks for the admission.
Safety isn't Absolutely necessary
It's CONDITIONAL..
Get the Right people supporting a riot, it's okay
But go to work?
Church?
Not approved..
You see it, good for you.

Ive made the point,, Not playin,,

The cost of 'not going to work'.

When the cost of not going to work is being murdered, it's a pretty big cost.

Must be a difficult for the white supremacists around here that the protests are actually working to wake up Americans to what has been going on for far too long with regard to the impunity of the police to murder. Washington has repealed statute 50-A.