I used it and presented in full every number I used to get there, with references.  You won't read it.

 Again:  It's not a direct mortality rate that was the concern.  It was the influx of patients entering limited capacity care centers in numbers that exceed their ability to provide treatment along with a circular recurrence as asymptomatic people spread it unknowingly to at-risk individuals.

 Overwhelming the system is the problem.  If your garbage news sources are saying millions will die, or that SARS-COV-2 is the worse pandemic in modern times, or that asymptomatic people are immune, or that Kohls was forced to close etc. then that is unfortunate for you.    

 Also I'd be interested in how you are managing to make a cruise ship a direct analogue for the entirety of the US as a whole.  It's like asking what the difference is between a Wal-Mart and a meat packing plant.  The differences far outweigh similarities, but it's much simpler to just say a disease should effect every building, airspace, person in the exact same way.

 I'd be interested in how you are managing to make a cruise ship a direct analogue for the entirety of the US as a whole.

 As I have said before.  Absolutely anyone can take today's information and tell someone else what they should have done.
 
 Did it kill anyone putting Mercy on a US dock to help US citizens if they needed it?  Nope.  Now that doesn't mean other restrictions were the best choice, but specifically and only the topic with the exclusion of all other topics, what damage did putting a US Navy medical ship on a US dock do?

 That IS what, the "Officials", (CDC and like), the Government/s, the controlled, "Media", (which includes the UL FDS Progressive Socialist Media) SAID !


 Can you point me to one report from the CDC that predicted millions of deaths?  I am aware of some used, and released by the White house that the CDC pointed out was not to be used as they were demonstrative.  


 "Major Media" is garbage resource, I've been saying that on here since I've been posting.  They very obviously alter coverage to appeal to their consumers for ad revenue incentive.  

 "Officials" that can/will not provide their sources are garbage resources.  "Governments" is a huge pool of collective resource, any that can/will not provide their sources are garbage resources.

 Websites that cut apart quoted from different occasions, cite losing court cases as precedent, leave out sections of reports, etc. etc. are also garbage news.  Facebook checklists are garbage resources.  YouTube physicians that "decline respectfully" to provide the source material they got their numbers from are garbage resources.

 There's a lot of garbage.  I prefer garbage that at least provides me enough information to replicate that garbage myself and not ones that just say stuff I like to hear.

I'd be interested in how you are managing to make a cruise ship a direct analogue for the entirety of the US as a whole.


Dont put words in my mouth

"And how do you NOT use the cruise ship as at least useful data? It obviously isnt 100% accurate, BUT Its Actual DATA,, nit death from alcohol poisoning Called CV.."

 I did, as did the CDC.  I presented the information on here in full.  Every number, every justification.  Cruise ship is there.  But you aren't going to read it, and also keep claiming it wasn't used.

 You asked about the AZ models, I presented information about their accuracy and now that's forgotten.  CO modeling is very close to real numbers, and CO is actively remunerating the UCOD numbers to account for the CDC coding for those models.  We need to elucidate the information metrics for different models then average them. When a prediction of census is an increase of 39% and we get 34% that's pretty darn close.

 Millions of deaths in the US, where?  Where did the CDC claim this?

 Some CO models try to account for underlying cause of death (UCOD) so everyone that dies in the next week aren't in the SARS-COV-2 primary mortality rate.

I totally dont get it