Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Piston to Cylinder clearance (Read 159 times)
Dennisgb
Full Member
***
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 176
Maplewood MN
Gender: male
Piston to Cylinder clearance
04/28/20 at 08:08:45
 
I’m wondering what the experts experience is with piston to cylinder clearance is. In my experience the clearance on air cooled engines needs to be more than on water cooled. On Norton’s we use .004-.005” Does that hold true for these engines?
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Fast 650
Senior Member
****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 405
Valrico, FL
Gender: male
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #1 - 04/28/20 at 09:33:05
 
Depends on how hard you plan to run it too. DBM found out what the minimum ring end gap should be the hard way. If you plan to run it hard stay on the wider side of the clearances.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
srinath
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 5349

Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #2 - 04/28/20 at 09:42:39
 
Yea its called putting it together "loose".
This bike saves you a lot of worry with the ball bearing cranks.
But yea loose - the down side you may use oil a wee bit, but the counter to that is, you wont gall and score and experience sudden death.

Cool.
Srinath.ts called
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Armen
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Half-Witted
Wrench-Jockey from
Jersey

Posts: 1452

Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #3 - 04/28/20 at 11:22:35
 
Remember that Norton ran that loose for two reasons:
a) they have cast iron cylinders which don't grow nearly as much as cast iron liners in aluminum sleeves.
b) those specs came from a time when Norton couldn't bore a hole that was even remotely round and straight. Modern machining has come a long way.
A 70's air cooled BMW (Airhead) was running about .0015" when Norton was doing .004-.005".
I've owned and worked on both Nortons and Airheads.
Follow what the factory Suzi-Q manual says.
Talk to Drag Bike Mike about torque plates if you are going to a serious oversize.
Back to top
 
 

In theory, theory and reality are the same. In reality, they aren't...
  IP Logged
Dennisgb
Full Member
***
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 176
Maplewood MN
Gender: male
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #4 - 04/28/20 at 12:02:18
 
Armen wrote on 04/28/20 at 11:22:35:
Remember that Norton ran that loose for two reasons:
a) they have cast iron cylinders which don't grow nearly as much as cast iron liners in aluminum sleeves.
b) those specs came from a time when Norton couldn't bore a hole that was even remotely round and straight. Modern machining has come a long way.
A 70's air cooled BMW (Airhead) was running about .0015" when Norton was doing .004-.005".
I've owned and worked on both Nortons and Airheads.
Follow what the factory Suzi-Q manual says.
Talk to Drag Bike Mike about torque plates if you are going to a serious oversize.


Thanks you guys.

Yeah I thought about the cast cylinder on the Norton after I posted. There is more expansion and contraction as I remember.

Poor Norton and those machines from before the war and the wooden fixtures. 😀 I hate to pick on them because I love my Commando.

I’ve read about the torque plates but don’t plan on doing anything too radical. Will stay pretty stock but clear out the exhaust ring while I have the head off.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Dennisgb
Full Member
***
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 176
Maplewood MN
Gender: male
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #5 - 04/28/20 at 12:20:40
 
The Norton and other bikes in my shop before the fire..
Back to top
 

7D8D8D40-41DB-40B3-8EA6-B42105257B15.jpeg
  IP Logged
DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 4406
Honolulu
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #6 - 04/28/20 at 16:53:06
 
Dennis, are you just curious or are you trying to setup your piston to cylinder clearance?

The clearance you choose depends on the piston and the application.  Typically, cast pistons are set up with tighter running clearance than forged pistons.  The cast pistons don't expand as much as forged pistons.

There are other factors that should be considered such as cylinder material (cast iron, aluminum with cast iron liner, aluminum with plasma coating, etc.), but lets stick with the Savage.  The Savage uses an aluminum cylinder with cast iron liner.

Factory clearance on the Savage is .0020".  While the wear limit is .0047", I personally wouldn't run it past .0035", but it will work OK up to .0047".

If you are throwing in a forged piston, you want the clearance a bit looser.  The standard 94mm Wiseco specifies .0025".  

Note that the 97mm Wiseco specifies .0019".  That defies logic.  I'm setting mine up about .0025".

If you are freshening up your top end and are installing new rings, a simple deglaze with a spring or ball hone will be fine as long as you are only deglazing (i.e. not enlarging the bore measurably).  If you are trying to straighten up your bore, or add a touch more clearance for a forged piston, toque plates are mandatory.  Trust me.  This cylinder changes dramatically when you squeeze it with torque plates.

The .004" to .005" you are considering is too much (IMO) if you are looking for good performance and longevity.

Good luck.

BTW. Sweet workshop.  Sorry about the fire.
Back to top
 
 

Knowledge is power.
  IP Logged
Dennisgb
Full Member
***
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 176
Maplewood MN
Gender: male
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #7 - 04/28/20 at 17:49:12
 
Thanks 😊

I should have been clearer with my description.

My plan is to use a stock Suzuki piston and cylinder. I purchased a used cylinder that came with a piston. The piston and bore looks to be in good shape, so my plan is to glaze bust the cylinder and put new rings on the piston. I know I could go further on this since I’m going in there but just want this one to be a decent runner with the side car rig.

I was asking the question so I could do some measurements when I get back to where the bike is. I have proper bore and piston measuring tools. Need to check out the bore for wear and the piston/bore clearance to determine if usable or if I should bore and replace the piston.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
justin_o_guy2
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

What happened?

Posts: 55279
East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #8 - 04/28/20 at 18:58:12
 
Maybe now isn't the time, but while I understand the minimum ring gap, but the maximum bewildered me.
When I was doing a Yamaha Raptor top end I bought rings and a piston from the Yamaha dealer. Came home, slipped rings on, slipped it in, nope, too much gap. Return, test, return, test, and every one was outta spec.. And they said
Those are what we use...
But I wouldn't, because the book said they were outta spec. Anyway, the owner had seen me so many times he asked what was going on. He told the guy to order me a matched up piston and ring set. I didn't even Hafta pay the kinda uncomfortable difference.

So, what would be the problem with a bit wider gap? Kiss off some compression?
Would it tend to score the cylinder?
Back to top
 
 

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke.
  IP Logged
Dennisgb
Full Member
***
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 176
Maplewood MN
Gender: male
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #9 - 04/28/20 at 19:14:50
 
Slightly wider gap not the end of the world. Don’t think it would loose much compression. Doubt if it would score cylinder.

It’s usually not too hard to file gaps to spec tho. A good file and a little patience. The problem I’ve had is tiny burrs on the gap edges.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
justin_o_guy2
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

What happened?

Posts: 55279
East Texas, 1/2 dallas/la.
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #10 - 04/28/20 at 19:47:39
 
Yeah, I just didn't think I should do much filing, seein as how the gap was already too big. Though I have cut boards that was already a mite short a time er two..
I don't recommend it.
Back to top
 
 

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.- Edmund Burke.
  IP Logged
Armen
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Half-Witted
Wrench-Jockey from
Jersey

Posts: 1452

Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #11 - 04/28/20 at 20:16:52
 
On BMWs I used to order 1st over rings to use with standard pistons and file to the minimum gap. On my R65 BMW (alloy jugs with iron liners) I set them up with .0008" piston to wall clearance. I had to buy the cylinders a few drinks to get the pistons in :-0
Never had a problem with tight clearances. Ran quiet and cool.
Now I use Nikasil cylinders on the Airheads and don't even stop to think.
Back to top
 
 

In theory, theory and reality are the same. In reality, they aren't...
  IP Logged
DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 4406
Honolulu
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #12 - 04/29/20 at 00:08:47
 
Ring gap is usually set to suit the application.  The gap is there to prevent the ring butts from touching, which will cause the ring to bind in the cylinder, and ultimately rip the top off your piston (like this).
Back to top
 

Lifted_Ring_Land_1_2.jpg

Knowledge is power.
  IP Logged
DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 4406
Honolulu
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #13 - 04/29/20 at 00:15:59
 
Although I had ample butt gap for a stock engine (as I recall I had .020" on the top ring, spec is .012" - .018"), it wasn't enough for what I was doin.  Run it on the lean side and you end up with the rings getting so hot that they close up the gap and bind.  You can see from this picture how the top of the piston was forced upward, it wasn't detonation, had to be ring binding.  Windin it up waaaaay too tight with stock rings and a lean mixture.  I needed more butt gap.
Back to top
 

Lifted_Ring_Land_4_2_001.JPG

Knowledge is power.
  IP Logged
DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 4406
Honolulu
Re: Piston to Cylinder clearance
Reply #14 - 04/29/20 at 00:34:06
 
Ring manufacturers generally specify butt gap based on application and bore diameter.  You usually want the second ring to have a little more gap than the top ring.  That prevents blow-by from building up in the space between the top & second ring, which could cause the top ring to lift off the ring land.

For example, high-performance street butt gap .0045" per inch of bore diameter.  The Savage bore is 3.700 inches so gap should be about .017".

Naturally aspirated drag race butt gap .0055" per inch of bore diameter, so gap should be about .020".

Nitrous race only butt gap .0070" per inch of bore diameter, so gap should be about .026".

The more you beat up on the engine the bigger the gap has to be.

It won't hurt much if the gap is too big, but it hurts like hell when its too small.

Keep in mind that the gap is a function of the circumference.  Circumference is 3.14 x diameter.  So, if your bore is .001" larger, the butt gap increases .003".  The piston doesn't have anything at all to do with butt gap.  The gap is solely dependent on bore diameter and ring circumference.  As things heat up, the ring circumference increases a lot more than the bore diameter increases.  The rings are the only avenue for heat transfer from the crown of the piston to the cylinder wall.  Those skinny little rings are moving a ton of BTUs from the piston to the cylinder.  They are one HOT tamale.
Back to top
 
 

Knowledge is power.
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
10/05/24 at 00:25:59



General CategoryRubber Side Down! › Piston to Cylinder clearance


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.