Yea, yeah, Trump, racist, sexist, Bullshit.
He hired the first female engineer to build a high rise.
Merkel is one sorry person. Trump, if in fact he didn't shake her hand, didn't make that choice because she's a woman or he feels intimidated by her genius,, he made that choice for reasons that you won't understand.

eau de sauvage wrote on 04/23/20 at 04:10:10:




I finally saw this video. The study is bogus bullcrappe.
The study is not a blind controlled trial - the standard required for being even submittable for peer review - which this wasn't.
The fatality rates etc etc are not indexed to severity and the study was from random after the fact deaths. In fact the ones not on HCQ were the least severe and the HCQ+az were the most severe. Those 2 being so close really is telling that that combo worked a lot better.
Then the biggest kicker is -
The fools who did this have no idea who HCQ works. This is as stupid as you trying to hammer a nail in the wall using your motorcycle  to bash it in, and then complaining that the wall has caved and its the motorcycles fault.

HCQ is a zinc into the cell transport enhancer.
Zinc kills off the virus's ability to replicate.
To get zinc to be more effective, the additional supplements are Vitamin D, vitamin C etc.
Azithromycin is an antibiotic, helps a little more effective killing of germs.
HCQ needs vit D, Vit C and most importantly zinc to do anything. Azithromycin is just a killer, get it into where the virus is, it kills that, else it will kill bacteria in your digestive tract. This will not work without zinc. No zinc was given - end of story. Bad study with dead people conducted bass ackwards.

Cool.
Srinath.

I say the CDC is in the pocket of big pharma.  They should have been instructing people to take vitamin c, vitamin d, and zinc from the start.  This is simply to strengthen the immune system.

Best regards,

"Ooooo Eegore - how fast can you back pedal out of the "Surprise hydroxychloroquine is bs. Who knew?" … Title of this thread."

 What are you talking about?

 In what capacity is stating I am aware of a zinc inclusive testing trial "back pedaling"?  It's zinc and hydroxychloroquine.

 I don't care what the politics are.

 I am just saying that since zinc inclusion studies are so small, even having just a few report no improvement has a higher percentage impact than a larger patient pool.

 Just basic math.

"In any case, yourve golne from BS to maybe its no as effective in 2 posts."

 I made no claims either way.  I said there is a reason it is found in elderly patients.  Arthritis.  For some reason you want to complain about that, but that won't make it less true.  Hydroxychloroquine is found in elderly patients with arthritis, and they all have to be weary of side-effects, like any other drug ever.


 Then I said that the zinc inclusionary trials, I am aware of, are small so the seven people that showed continued presence, and growth of SARS-COV-2 hit that trial percentage hard because the zinc inclusionary trials, I am aware of, are small in number.  For some reason you want to complain about that, but it won't change the fact that zinc inclusionary trials, that I am aware of, are small in number.

 That's it.  I said old-people have hydroxychloroquine in their systems and that zinc inclusionary trials, that I am aware of, are small in number.