Eegore
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 8343
|
"How am I supposed to KNOW exactly who is lying? Did you see the instructions to the doctor?"
Yes, in full. I also read and did the exercise in VSRG#03, did you? What part of those orders, specifically reference the words, and what you disagree with.
"Is the DOCTOR LYING?"
No. The doctor provide verifiable evidence, did you read all of it, then reference the supplemental materials? If so what part of that material is dishonest, and how can disclosure of method even be dishonest?
"Id deaths are Attributed to to CV because someone who had a poaitive result post mortem but they died in a wreck,, I call that a lie"
I'd call that a lie too, except the documentation you linked doesn't say to do that. If it does, and I missed it, please point out, in the actual documentation where it says to place SARS-COV-2 as UCOD outside of standard etiology practice.
"CAN you ATTEST your SOURCE IS honest?"
Its your source I am referencing. And the totality of the evidence points to yes, since the material is documented thoroughly and exists on what appears to be live unaltered video.
"wEVE SEEN SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO SERIOUSLY QUESTION THE VALIDITY OF THE NUMBERS WE ARE BEING TOLD. who, exactly IS crEATING THOSE NUMBERS, who the fukk knows?"
I agree. Except you are saying that the act of telling you how those numbers are coded temporarily is a lie. The CDC is lying when they tell you how they are collecting data for their own use.
So I answered your questions, and I expect you will continue to refuse to answer mine but here it goes anyway:
If I tell you, and submit in writing that I am creating a data pool of vehicle related deaths that Include suicides in non-moving vehicles as a provisional count, not intended for final count purposes, am I lying?
|