I don't think so.  Not sure what you mean by "sink" though.  Maybe they are passing a bill knowing that the US will fall into catastrophic failure ending the nation, but I doubt it.

 I think it's an issue of choosing between multiple bad situations and evaluating which is better.  Would it be better to allow foreclosures, regular unemployment benefits, no aid to schools or healthcare?

 Would it be better to allow people to do what they want and hope the medical care system here can handle what no other country has been able to, or hope the disease somehow skips the US and infects us at a lower rate?

 Would it be better to create a stimulus package that creates a larger debt?  

 To me the only one that might work is the stimulus package as I see no reason for the virus to be less lethal on US soil, or for the medical care system to handle the need if people remain at work and schools.  

"That one.
For the sole purpose of winning a election,
so the winner can be controlled,
To allow some people to stuff their pockets."

 How will that "sink" the US?

"Wow, just wow."

 So you think that this stimulus package will end the US?  No more borders, states, citizenship etc.?

 Wow, just wow.

Perhaps,'sink' can be equated to moving closer to, socialist/progressive/PC correct and rewarding people by their color of skin/religion/ethnic and AZZ kissing,  Instead of, 'Ability'.

 I interpreted it differently.  Your assessment is considerably more likely than the complete elimination of the US infrastructure.