DragBikeMike
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 4140
Honolulu
|
With the Wiseco piston, I installed the 340b cam on the factory timing marks. The initial compression check showed 185 psi. That improved to 195 psi after about about 500 miles of very easy break-in. 195 psi is right where I want to be. I should be able to run 92 octane without ever having to worry about the dreaded spark knock.
Since installing the Wiseco, I have been able to do a lot of testing. I have loads of comparative data.
One thing I noticed immediately is vibration. The LS vibrates a lot more with the Wiseco piston. The 94mm Wiseco is 52 grams lighter than the stock assembly. The mirrors are blurred continuously, and long freeway hauls really put my hands and butt to sleep. It’s manageable, but I think the 97mm Wiseco would be a better choice. It’s only 11 grams lighter than stock and will most likely run much smoother.
In terms of performance, the tight quench setup kills the Wiseco. The tight quench has a lot more compression and you really feel it. It has torque that starts low and never stops. Second gear acceleration from 4K to 7K is much faster (2.60 tight quench vs 2.90 Wiseco). That’s a comparison using exactly the same cylinder head, camshaft, carburetor, airbox, exhaust system, etc., the only difference being the method of compression enhancement. The additional compression is clearly an advantage. I also believe that the tight quench setup yields much better combustion. If you imagine that 0.3 second acceleration advantage over five gears, you start to see what a big difference it is.
From a practical perspective, you can’t beat the Wiseco. You may not achieve the same all out performance, but the simplicity of installation makes it a better choice. It’s still plenty fast, and you don’t need a machine shop to install it. There are no cam chain tensioner hurdles, and valve-to-piston clearance isn’t a problem. Installation is easy. It really offers a lot of bang for the bucks.
|