srinath wrote on 01/31/20 at 08:09:28:


So....the date is on then....???  

You gonna ride over, two up, with Bot?

Hey … wasn't Whistle blower Monica Lewinsky's Secret service code name …
Cool.
Srinath.

"Can you point me to where I said..... law."

 No.  


I will ask you if you mean law is in: "It's against the law to come into the states, illegally......yes, that kinda law?

 Yes.

Oh, BTW, did it make you feel better, your reply, seems your "in no other thing of any form in any known way shape or form"......seems a wee bit over the top, like you have a point to prove?

 My point is to enforce that the sentences in this post apply to this post and in context to how the entire sentence is used within this post.  Not to be taken out of context, partially, and altered, in an attempt to delegitimize sentences in a different post that have nothing to do with this conversation in context or topic.  In no known way, shape or form.


I took the liberty of emboldening the operative word, in your statement.....maybe someone does know, and that is why we should investigate it BEFORE we go further down this road.

 I can't see the post at this time, I don't know what is in bold but will check it later.


But in reality, it makes no difference, as the transcript of the call is known, by many......and they didn't hear any quid pro quo, spoken, or any other matters that broke the law, that would require removal of the president from office.....did you?  

 I'm not familiar enough with the full context of the laws and procedures to have an opinion about removal specifically.  Criteria in legal form is enforced by law.  What I do know is the criteria did not change, as in the legal enforcement did not change, the wording on the form did however.

raydawg wrote on 01/31/20 at 15:42:29:


He can borrow bloomberg's box... if he needs one.