The foundation posted its third straight year of losses following Hillary Clinton's defeat in the 2016 presidential election, according to 2018 tax documents.

The foundation lost $16.8 million on revenue of $30.7 million in 2018, according to the documents. It has posted roughly $16 million in losses every year since 2015, when it had roughly $116 million in revenue.

If it was such a good and worthy cause before why not still....???

What has changed......?????  

source: https://www.foxnews.com/media/peter-schweizer-clinton-foundation-fundraising-...

Powerful people leveraging their power to do good- only sociopaths list that as a sin.

Didn't Trump have a "charity"?   I wonder what happened to that... something about stealing money given to veterans and court ordered law familirization classes for the Trumps, as I recall.  

A cursory review of charity review agencies- organizations whose mission is to identify fraud and graft and waste in charitable organizations for givers -give the Clinton Foundation an "A", with an 88% donation conversion to programs.   The Trump Foundation received an "F", has been de-listed as a charity, and was the subject of criminal prosecution.  Of those charities chosen by the Trump Foundation to distribute to after being forced to pay out by court order, many received "F", "D", and "C" ratings.

Judging between the Clintons and the Trumps character as expressed through charity work, the Clintons are the best choice by any sane metric. 

Fallen out of favor?

You don't suspect any possibility of wrong doing based on the drop off after her defeat and removal from any position of power?

WebsterMark wrote on 11/21/19 at 07:19:32:


Yeah...that was my question, Mark, but some seem nefarious things abound, like a paranoia......

If it was a worthy endeavor, bringing about good things and results, that is still of value and worthy, weird that because a name doesn't taste the same, then that is justification to let a good thing wither away....

Just odd, oh well, life is getting stranger everyday it seems.

Do you think because Trump asked the Ukrainian president for a favor, and has been charged by these folks, with devious intentions, that is the kind of favor they were expecting by donating Mark?

Seems to fit....eh?  

WebsterMark wrote on 11/21/19 at 07:19:32:



No.  I think you're thinking of trump's charity. Didn't he spend it on himself?  Didn't he take money earmarked for vets and spend it on his campaign?

This is a simple case of the Clintons not being as popular as they were.

BFD

There's a difference between accepting a donation, and extorting a foreign official to commit an illegal act for personal gain using public funds, while subverting the will of Congress.

Your pretzel logic does not compute.

Actually ray, this thread brings up a great question....

Why isn't trump being impeached for illegally running his "charity" through his campaign?


http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=tOMnNab_PLUS_PiN...

Therefore, he had to dissolve it.



Funny how his supporters overlooked all that and still point to the Clintons.

Talk about snowflakes....

The trumpers need to learn to stay in their lane and own what their president is doing.

T And T Garage wrote on 11/21/19 at 08:14:04:


They have no want or compulsion to do so; they gleefully cast about, this way and that, driving over civil order, decency, ethics- all for this transient moment of attention.   When Trump appealed to racism and "the forgotten man", a spark blossomed in their chest- 'finally- it's MY TIME!'   Things like humanity, ethics, and courage are consumed in that fire.

Or maybe I'm wrong.   Ray, you gonna vote for a guy who stole from a charity a second time?   Is that who you are?   Are you gonna vote for the guy who swindled students looking to him for help?   Is that who you are?   Is that the company you keep?   A guy who slept with a copy of Mein Kampf by his bed?   Are you going to say 'he's my man!', then continue on with your George-Soros-Jewish-conspiracy crap?

My guess is you don't come back from that.   Maybe I'm wrong, Ray.   Show me I'm wrong.   Be a better man.