pg wrote on 11/21/19 at 14:48:54:I will admit I was busy the last two days and didn't see much of the proceeding.
Really, you have to review it yourself. Do you really want some other person's interpretation? Probably not.
Where is the first hand accounts of impeachable offences?Though abridged, it was right there in the transcript of the phone call.
Let's remove the teams from what happened. It's like this- it's Winter, temperatures are dropping to life-threatening lows- and your power company cuts your power. You call the power company and talk to the engineer, saying how you'd like to buy some more power. The engineer says that he'd like that too- but he'd like you to commit to perpetrating a crime with him first.
Say that isn't what happened? Trump agrees... with me. Every time he orders one of our civil servants not to testify, every time he orders the withholding of documents, he confirms his guilt.
You know he's a crook. You know he's a liar. Why don't you start acting on what you know? Let what you know inform your assessment- not some non-sequitur abridged version that doesn't exist in the real world.