Eegore
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 8402
|
"First, you don't know how high it goes. Second, when federal officers come on property someone who does not know the proper protocol will likely conform to their demands."
And lose their job immediately, and in many cases be prosecuted. I've been in several military and Federal institutions over the years and nobody is allowed to "conform with demands." In most cases people that are covering a post they do not normally do, they are more diligent not less. If I volunteer to work an access gate at a military post what incentive do I have to be less diligent? It's illegal to prosecute, punish, fire, discipline me for exceeding the standard security protocol. So wait in line General while I get you clearance.
As far as that goes, why wouldn't the many people that the two guys brought in to kill an inmate in the middle of the night had to get clearance from not say a word?
This access control is being over-simplified, like saying "Shut off cameras", modern camera systems use login controls and enclosed wiring, it's not like the movies where you pull out the fiber line, or flip a physical switch like in the 1980's. You need access to the room, access to the system, a password, then a way to remove your login and a way to remove your badge-in history to the room itself. Lets not forget a way to delete the footage in a totally separate storage area, and the cloud storage, controls are typically no longer kept with storage. Just in the Medical center I worked at camera controls needed two staff members simultaneously and the recordings were in triplicated and at separate locations at once.
"Did you know one of the guards, was not a detention guard and reassigned to that post?"
I did. How does volunteering for overtime mean that the staff wouldn't say: "Last night two guys came in, told me to "go on break", then we found Epstein dead?"
Why wouldn't they say that? What part of job reassignment makes one incapable of reporting the middle of the night unscheduled mandatory break?
If this is a really high up planned execution, again: Why would they choose the more complex easier to prove as murder route, instead of an easier, harder to prove method?
Why would they choose the harder more incriminating process?
"How do explain the broken bones in his neck, the bruises on his hands, and bruises on his shoulder?"
I already addressed this in another post with 4 medical studies indicating clearly that men over 60 are more likely to break a hyoid bone during suicidal hanging.
How do you explain everyone except the family hired assessment saying it's suicide? This one guy is correct, all other forensic pathologists wrong.
Again I am not saying this wasn't a murder, I just don't know why the process for doing it has to be so complex. Why not use an easier, harder to prove method?
Note: This post is an opinion in response to what I consider pertinent and valuable discussion material. While they are words on a screen I contribute in an attempt to engage in discussion instead of contributing by slinging insults at other members.
|