Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Mechanically safe sustainable speed? (Read 427 times)
stewmills
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

Imagination is more
important than
knowledge

Posts: 2634
Auburn, AL
Gender: male
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #15 - 11/19/19 at 07:36:38
 
I don't know the 'math' (Dave can tell you), but what is happening is what you said...the larger front pulley pulls a slightly faster rotation on the rear wheel so it takes slightly less RPM to go the same speed. Since this bike has such great torque, the effect on the torque is negligible. At first you notice that 1st gear is 'taller' and you have to feather the clutch a tad more to get rolling smoothly and the shift pattern is different (in a good way...smoother), but once you get adjusted to it (very quickly) it makes you wonder why the bike wasn't made that way.

If you get one and need the instructions I put together to install yours, I can dig up the photos and reload them. They were killed when inypic shut down.  http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1484806731
Back to top
 
 

2008 | 152/52.5–Air Mix 3/4 | Rotella T4 | Seat Lift w/Sheepskin | Speedo Rattle | Rear Pulley Shim | 140/90-15 Rear | Kaw Front Pulley | Relocated Rear Signals

FREEDOM ISN'T FREE!
  IP Logged
batman
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 3806
osceola new york
Gender: male
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #16 - 11/19/19 at 23:25:52
 
The math for the front pulley :    23/25= .92   or 92%
   
                            60 mph =4008 rpm (stock)
                 (60 x66.8 =4008)

                            60 mph =4008 X.92 = 3687  (kawa front pulley)
                                Motor rpm reduced by 321 rpm @60 mph
                 (60 x61.456 = 3687)
     66.8 & 61.456 being the motor rpm to =1 mph  in each case (in 5th gear)  (4 speed bikes the number 66.12 stock-in 4th gear)
                 the 8 %  reduction in motor speed should show an ALMOST equal gain in mpg.
                   
                   
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 11/20/19 at 08:51:01 by batman »  

my old work mates called me MacGyver
  IP Logged
WD
Serious Thumper
2005 No Login
*****
Offline

Professional
"scooter
trash".

Posts: 5207
Rosemark TN
Gender: male
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #17 - 11/22/19 at 13:57:37
 
My daily rider turned parts bike turned dirt track project has 155 main and 55 pilot jets. White spacer not touched. At 1/2 “choke” Pokey could “roll coal” like an old 2 stroke diesel. If you get it jetted correctly, you can start it w/o the “choke”.

If you plan on any real distance riding, upgrade the rear shocks. Add a front mudflap. Raise the front of your seat. Add an HD-01 windshield, set perfectly vertical. You might want a set of Evo RoadKing handlebars in taller risers. Both of mine had a full rear fender conversion...
Back to top
 

FD407358-2480-4104-8A02-859FF940AF2E.jpeg

On 2 wheels since 7/87

Black and Chrome 2003 1950s style custom
  IP Logged
batman
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 3806
osceola new york
Gender: male
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #18 - 11/22/19 at 15:05:57
 
If you plan on any real distance riding, upgrade the rear shocks. Add a front mudflap.

   or use a Harley Sportster front fender,  It's  rear curves much nearer to the ground and keeps all road spray off your boots and shins.
Back to top
 
 

my old work mates called me MacGyver
  IP Logged
Dennisgb
Full Member
***
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 176
Maplewood MN
Gender: male
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #19 - 11/22/19 at 21:44:49
 
WD wrote on 11/22/19 at 13:57:37:
If you get it jetted correctly, you can start it w/o the “choke”.


In my experience if it starts without choke it’s running rich 😳
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Matchless G11
Senior Member
****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 451
Newfoundland NJ
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #20 - 11/23/19 at 03:46:53
 
Running too rich is bad, You can "wash" off the oil off the cylinder wall. causing wear.

In the 1960s there was a report in "Cycle"? magazine where they found out that most ring problems were caused by too rich a mixture.

If your oil smells gassy you are too rich. (or you haven't upgraded your petcock)  Sad
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
ohiomoto
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2704
WTF is JOG?
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #21 - 11/23/19 at 15:12:02
 
Dennisgb wrote on 11/22/19 at 21:44:49:
WD wrote on 11/22/19 at 13:57:37:
If you get it jetted correctly, you can start it w/o the “choke”.


In my experience if it starts without choke it’s running rich 😳
----------

Agreed, but I say a cold start.  Once warm, you shouldn't need the choke.  

Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Mavigogun
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

We roll farther
together

Posts: 775
Progressive Texas
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #22 - 11/25/19 at 08:42:37
 
WD wrote on 11/22/19 at 13:57:37:
If you plan on any real distance riding, upgrade the rear shocks. Add a front mudflap. Raise the front of your seat. Add an HD-01 windshield, set perfectly vertical.


It feels like the stock shock suffers at the start- especially when gunning around a tight corner, where the back end seems to squish and shift sideways; is that something I should expect to be confronted by a shock upgrade?

I'd like to keep myself as low as possible on the bike, often find myself crouched forward over the tank at high speeds  (70's-90's).  I removed the Boulevard-branded wind screen after 2k miles, and am mostly happier without it, will likely fit a very small cowling to deflect wind to the helmet, keeping cold air off the chest in the at-speed-position and supporting my head.   A hang glider pilot, I like to feel the wind.   I like the rumble and vibration of the bike.   These things let me know I'm not on the couch -that I'm alive, flying down the road, clutched atop a machine.
Back to top
 
 

2007 LS650 s40, presently being rebuilt
  IP Logged
Murphdawg
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 7

Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #23 - 06/19/21 at 06:02:40
 
Hey WD, I was not able to PM you until I have more posts so I’m just commenting on one of yours.

A while back you commented on a hardtail question and showed some curved struts.

They look a heck of a lot better than normal struts as they curve and mount in shock location giving an appearance of a legit hardtail.

Just wondering what these are called and where I can get them??

Thanks a lot and apologies if I’m handling this out of procedure.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
ohiomoto
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2704
WTF is JOG?
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #24 - 06/19/21 at 06:17:38
 
Dennisgb wrote on 11/22/19 at 21:44:49:
WD wrote on 11/22/19 at 13:57:37:
If you get it jetted correctly, you can start it w/o the “choke”.

------------
In my experience if it starts without choke it’s running rich 😳
----------

As is rolling coal with a 4-stroke.  Watch a Pro Motocross or Supercross race (the all run 4-strokes these days) and you won't see a puff of smoke...ever.
Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Gary_in_NJ
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

LS650 Cafe Racer

Posts: 2630
Amongst the Twisty Roads
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #25 - 06/19/21 at 11:59:08
 
Those bike also have EFI.
Back to top
 
 

A life-time student of motorcycling.
LS650 Cafe, DRZ400SM, FZ6N, SV650S, CB900C, Ducati ST2, CB550F-SS
My LS650=> http://suzukisavage.com/yabb2.2/Attachments/Left.JPG
  IP Logged
ohiomoto
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2704
WTF is JOG?
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #26 - 06/20/21 at 18:18:33
 
Gary_in_NJ wrote on 06/19/21 at 11:59:08:
Those bike also have EFI.
----------

They didn't when the first hit the scene (and they didn't smoke) and the system can be tuned with a computer/phone app.  They can make them as rich as they want, but they don't.  

My point is anyone saying the run rich enough to roll coal is talking silly.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Gary_in_NJ
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

LS650 Cafe Racer

Posts: 2630
Amongst the Twisty Roads
Re: Mechanically safe sustainable speed?
Reply #27 - 06/21/21 at 03:42:58
 
Agreed.

And yes, modern dirt bikes are marvelous machines. I love riding a 2 stroke, but I’m faster and have more confidence (especially on the face of a jump) on a 4 stroke.
Back to top
 
 

A life-time student of motorcycling.
LS650 Cafe, DRZ400SM, FZ6N, SV650S, CB900C, Ducati ST2, CB550F-SS
My LS650=> http://suzukisavage.com/yabb2.2/Attachments/Left.JPG
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
06/01/24 at 21:33:32



General CategoryRubber Side Down! › Mechanically safe sustainable speed?


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.